United States

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the year ended: December 31, 2021

or

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the period ended:

QSAM Biosciences, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

9442 Capital of Texas Hwy N, Plaza 1, Suite 500

Austin, TX 78759

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(512) 343-4558

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code)

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.0001

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or emerging growth company:

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the average bid and asked price of such common stock on OTCQB of $0.35, as of the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $5.6 million.

As of February 21, 2022, there were issued and outstanding 66,484,085 shares of the registrant’s common stock.

Documents incorporated by reference: None.

QSAM Biosciences, Inc.

Index

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This document contains certain forward-looking statements that are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are generally identifiable by use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “potential,” “intend,” “expect,” “outlook,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “approximately,” “believe,” “could,” “project,” “predict,” or other similar words or expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions, discuss future expectations, describe future plans and strategies, contain financial and operating projections or state other forward-looking information. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future events, actions, plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, our actual results and performance could differ materially from those set forth or anticipated in our forward-looking statements. Factors that could have a material adverse effect on our forward- looking statements and upon our business, results of operations, financial condition, funds derived from operations, cash available for dividends, cash flows, liquidity and prospects include, but are not limited to, the factors referenced in this document, including those set forth below:

When considering forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors and other cautionary statements in this document. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements, which reflect our views as of the date of this document. The matters summarized below and elsewhere in this document could cause our actual results and performance to differ materially from those set forth or anticipated in forward-looking statements. Accordingly, we cannot guarantee future results or performance. Furthermore, except as required by law, we are under no duty to, and we do not intend to, update any of our forward-looking statements after the date of this document, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

MARKET DATA

Certain market and industry data included in this document is derived from information provided by third-party market research firms, or third-party financial or analytics firms that we believe to be reliable. Market estimates are calculated by using independent industry publications, government publications and third-party forecasts in conjunction with our assumptions about our markets. We have not independently verified such third-party information. The market data used in this document involves a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such estimates. While we are not aware of any misstatements regarding any market, industry or similar data presented herein, such data involves risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, including those discussed below and set forth in the “Risk Factors” section of this document. These and other factors could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in the estimates made by the independent parties and by us. Certain data are also based on our good faith estimates, which are derived from management’s knowledge of the industry and independent sources. Industry publications, surveys and forecasts generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but there can be no assurance as to the accuracy or completeness of included information. We have not independently verified any of the data from third-party sources nor have we ascertained the underlying economic assumptions relied upon therein. Statements as to our market position are based on market data currently available to us. While we are not aware of any misstatements regarding the industry data presented herein, our estimates involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, including those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in this document. Similarly, we believe our internal research is reliable, even though such research has not been verified by any independent sources.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

In this Annual Report, references to the “Company,” “we,” “our,” “us” and words of similar import refer to QSAM Biosciences, Inc., the Registrant, a Delaware corporation. References to “QSAM” or the “Subsidiary” refer to QSAM Therapeutics Inc., a Texas corporation, our wholly-owned subsidiary and operating company.

Overview

We are developing next-generation nuclear medicines for the treatment of cancer and related diseases. Our initial technology is Samarium-153 DOTMP, a/k/a CycloSam^® (“CycloSam^®” or the “New Technology”), a clinical-stage bone targeting radiopharmaceutical. CycloSam^® features a patented, low specific activity form of Samarium-153, a beta-emitting radioisotope with a short 46-hour half-life, and the chelating agent DOTMP, which selectively targets sites of high bone mineral turnover and reduces off-site migration of the tumor-killing radiation. We believe improvements in formulation and manufacturing from a prior FDA-approved drug utilizing the same radioisotope (Quadramet®) has resulted in our drug candidate demonstrating significantly less impurities, lower costs and more frequent availability. Samarium-153 and DOTMP form a highly stable complex, which we believe, when used either as a monotherapy or in combination with other more widely used treatments such as external beam radiation, may demonstrate meaningful disease modifying results in primary and metastatic bone cancer. Ultimately, we may seek to further develop and commercialize CycloSam® for one or more market indications or license the technology to a larger pharmaceutical partner.

In August 2021, the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) cleared our Investigational New Drug (IND) application to commence Phase 1 clinical trials for CycloSam^® as a treatment for cancer that has metastasized to the bone from the lung, breast, prostate and other areas. We initiated this trial at our first site (Houston, TX) in November 2021 and we seek to commence dosing patients in this open-label, dose escalating study in the first quarter of 2022. Also in August 2021, the FDA granted Orphan Drug Designation for the use of CycloSam^® to treat a primary bone cancer called osteosarcoma, a devastating disease that mostly affects children and young adults. Although patients with osteosarcoma or Ewing’s sarcoma are eligible to participate in our initial Phase 1 trials, we anticipate filing an amended protocol to our current commercial IND application in 2022 to commence clinical trials specifically for these primary, pediatric bone cancers. In May 2020, CycloSam® was also utilized in a Single Patient Investigational New Drug for Emergency Use at the Cleveland Clinic. We believe the study we conducted at the Cleveland Clinic showed promising safety results in connection with a bone marrow ablation procedure, including patient tolerability at high dosages. To date, CycloSam® has completed animal studies in both small and large animals, including treating bone cancer in patient dogs at a university veterinary clinic.

Current Development Stage of CycloSam® for Target Indications. Our initial IND to commence Phase 1 clinical trials for CycloSam^® as a treatment for cancer that has metastasized to the bone from the lung, breast, prostate and other areas has been cleared by the FDA, and we seek to commence dosing patients in the first quarter of 2022. Patients with primary bone cancer, such as osteosarcoma or Ewing’s sarcoma, are eligible to participate in our initial Phase 1 trials; however, we anticipate filing an amended protocol to our current commercial IND application in 2022 to commence an additional clinical trial specifically for these primary, pediatric bone cancers. Our initial Phase 1 trial is an open label, dose escalating study of approximately 20 patients. Enrollment commenced in February 2022 and the Phase 1 trials are expected to continue over the following 12 to 24 months.

What is CycloSam^®. CycloSam® is a targeted, bone seeking radiopharmaceutical that combines the beta-emitting radioisotope Samarium-153 (¹⁵³Sm) with a chelating agent, DOTMP (1, 4, 7, 10-tetraazacyclododecane-1, 4, 7, 10-tetramethylenephosphonic acid). Samarium-153 is acquired from a nuclear reactor from a third party and the chelating agent is supplied in the form of kits. Chelating agents are organic compounds capable of linking together metal ions to form complex ring-like structures. This combination forms a stable complex which delivers a radioactive dose to sites of rapid bone mineral turnover such as bone cancers and tumors. CycloSam^® has a physical half-life of 46 hours (radiation decreases by half in 46 hours) and emits both medium-energy beta particles that produce the therapeutic effect, and gamma photons that make it possible to take images of the skeleton and locate and characterize the size and nature of tumors. The use of radioisotopes to both diagnose and treat disease is called “theranostics” and is a rapidly growing area of medical discovery.

How CycloSam^® Works – Mechanism of Action & Administration. CycloSam® utilizes a chelating agent called DOTMP that seeks out bone locations of high mineral turnover, typical in cancer cells and tumor growth. The DOTMP part of the molecule is taken up by calcium turnover locations in bones and carries the radioactive “payload” along with it. The radioisotope Samraium-153 emits radiation as it decomposes in the form of beta particles. Approximately 50% of the radioactivity concentrates in bone mineral with a very high lesion-to-normal bone ratio. We believe this provides a radiation dose to the adjacent tumor cells. The absorbed radiation dose produces the presumed therapeutic effect to the tumor, killing the cancer cells or slowing their growth by damaging their DNA. Our pre-clinical studies and single patient IND performed at the Cleveland Clinic has demonstrated that the remaining half of the administered activity is rapidly excreted through the kidneys.

Generally, radiation therapy does not immediately kill cancer cells and more than one treatment is expected to eradicate a tumor, dramatically reduce its size, or slow its growth. CycloSam® has a short half-life of 46 hours and is rapidly eliminated from the body. This avoids an undesirable radioactive buildup in healthy tissues and organs when used in multiple treatments, which we believe, is an important feature of CycloSam® over predecessor drugs. CycloSam® has also not demonstrated saturation of the bone sites in animal studies, which supports a multi-dosage treatment regimen. Additionally, we believe that high dosages may be administered for ablating the marrow in patients that may require procedures such as stem cell transplants.

The final drug product of CycloSam® is prepared from DOTMP kits and ¹⁵³SmCl in 0.1 N HCl at a nuclear pharmacy local to the patient administration site. The final drug product is then delivered to the physician for use as an intravenous (IV) injection within 72 hours.

How is CycloSam® Made – Method of Manufacturing. CycloSam® uses a patented, low-specific-activity Samarium-153 which is produced in the lower flux region (beryllium reflector) of the nuclear reactor and can be accessed with a pneumatic tube on a daily basis. Once prescribed by radiation oncologists and nuclear medicine physicians, we order the radioisotopes from Missouri University Research Reactor (MURR) to be sent overnight to an onsite or nearby (to the patient) nuclear pharmacy to be compounded with a DOTMP “cold kit” and delivered to the treating physician for administration. While CycloSam® is still in clinical development, we believe that we have already established an efficient and cost-effective manufacturing process and supply chain, allowing the clinician to treat the patient within approximately three days from order.

The DOTMP “cold kit” is patent pending, and developed by IsoTherapeutics LLC, the inventors of CycloSam®. Although we believe the IsoTherapeutics cGMP manufacturing facility has the capacity to manufacture sufficient supply for our initial rollout, we are concurrently securing secondary manufacturing partners for the kits. MURR has been our source of Samarium-153 used in both our animal studies and the Single Patient IND for Emergency Use at the Cleveland Clinic, and MURR has verbally committed to supply us Samarium-153 in the future. Although we expect MURR to be our primary supplier of Samarium-153 in the U.S. subject to definitive agreements, and we believe they have the capability to produce our requirements of Samarium-153 on a commercial scale for U.S. distribution, we plan to qualify additional suppliers in 2022 as part of our supply chain and general business risk diversification strategy.

What are CycloSam®’s anticipated competitive advantages. We believe CycloSam® has competitive advantages over current radiopharmaceutical offerings in the marketplace. Such potential competitive advantages include:

The competitive advantages we believe to be important to CycloSam® are based on pre-clinical animal and other studies including our single patient IND at the Cleveland Clinic. We cannot be sure that our technology will perform similarly in clinical trials with multiple human patients. Failure to achieve these competitive advantages could negatively affect our ability to achieve FDA approval as a new drug, or our ability to market CycloSam® as a treatment for bone cancer.

Intellectual Property

Pursuant to the License Agreement, our IP estate includes 14 total patents issued and pending across three distinct patent families that we believe provide protection for the use of CycloSam^® as a radiopharmaceutical in the U.S. and internationally. Under the License Agreement, the Company holds two issued patents in the US, two issued patents in Japan, one issued patent in Canada, one allowed patent in Europe, and seven pending patents in international jurisdictions. Notably, the CycloSam^® kit that will be commercialized is protected by the extensive patent estate that broadly protects DOTMP kit formulations for radioisotopes, potentially allowing for efficient distribution of the product and widespread use. Additionally, the patents cover the use of low-specific activity Samarium-153 allowing for daily supply of the highly toxicity-reduced isotope, and methods relating to repeat dosing regimens for therapeutic radiopharmaceutical agents, which suggest increased efficacy based on prior research. Taken together, management believes that the patent family provides for a significant barrier to entry for a competitor as it is expected to prevent a generic product from being developed; however, we cannot guarantee that a competitor will not or cannot challenge our patents or otherwise circumvent our patents, or that we would have the resources to defend any patent infringement.

A list of our patents and status of prosecution is included in the following table:

Pursuant to the License Agreement, the Company also has the right to use the registered trademark “CycloSam®” for the marketing and sale of the drug candidate.

Competition

The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are characterized by the rapid evolution of technologies and understanding of disease etiology, a strong emphasis on intellectual property and intense competition. We face substantial potential competition from many different sources, including major pharmaceutical, specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic research institutions, governmental agencies and public and private research institutions.

In addition to the current methods of care for cancer patients, the field of radiopharmaceuticals is deeply studied and many parties are pursuing commercial and academic clinical trials. Early results from these trials have fueled continued interest in radiopharmaceuticals, which are pursued by several biotechnology companies as well as by large pharmaceutical companies.

We consider our direct competitors to be companies developing targeted alpha radiopharmaceuticals for the treatment of cancer. There are several companies developing targeted alpha-based radiopharmaceuticals for the treatment of cancer, including Bayer AG, or Bayer, Novartis AG, or Novartis, Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., RadioMedix, Inc, Orano Med, Telix Pharmaceuticals Limited, and Fusion Pharmaceuticals Inc., as well as several early-stage companies who recently entered the field such as RayzeBio, Inc. These companies are targeting a wide range of solid and hematologic malignancies using various alpha emitting isotopes, including Radium-223, Actinium-225 and Thorium-227. The first and only approved alpha particle-based therapy is Bayer’s Xofigo, a salt of radium that is not currently attached to a targeting molecule, but naturally localizes to regions where cancer cells are infiltrating bone. Xofigo was approved in the United States by the FDA in 2013 for the treatment of bone metastases associated with prostate cancer.

There are several companies with approved or late clinical stage beta-based radiopharmaceuticals, including Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novartis, Bayer and Q BioMed Inc., which we also consider competitors. Another competitive company, POINT Biopharma Global Inc., has two indications using beta-emitting particles in Phase 3 trials. The beta emitting isotopes used by these companies include Iodine-131, Lutetium-177, Strontium-89 and Yttrium-90. There are other beta particle-based radiopharmaceuticals in various stages of clinical development by companies including Novartis AG, Ipsen S.A., Y-mAbs Therapeutics, Inc. and Clovis Oncology, Inc.

Many of our current or potential competitors, either alone or with their collaboration partners, have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing approved products than we do. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These competitors also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel and establishing clinical trial sites and patient enrollment in clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies and materials complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.

We could see a reduction or elimination in our commercial opportunity if our competitors develop and commercialize drugs that are safer, more effective, have fewer or less severe side effects, are more convenient to administer, are less expensive or with a more favorable label than our product candidates. Our competitors also may obtain FDA or other regulatory approval for their drugs more rapidly than we may obtain approval for ours, which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to enter the market. The key competitive factors affecting the success of all of our product candidates, if approved, are likely to be their efficacy, safety, convenience, price, the effectiveness of imaging diagnostics, the level of generic competition and the availability of reimbursement from government and other third-party payors.

Radiopharmaceutical Market

The radiopharmaceutical market is projected to reach $13.8 Billion by 2028 from $7.6 Billion in 2021, according to a published study by The Insight Partners: “Radiopharmaceuticals Market to 2028 – Global Analysis and Forecast.” Overall, the market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 9.0% during 2021–2028. North America dominates the global radiopharmaceuticals market, which is attributed to the prevalence of chronic disorders and the presence of supportive government plans for the development of research regarding radiopharmaceuticals. Based on type, the radiopharmaceuticals market is bifurcated into diagnostic nuclear medicine and therapeutic nuclear medicine. The diagnostic nuclear medicine segment is holding a larger share of the market and is anticipated to register a higher CAGR during 2021–2028. By application, the market is segmented into oncology, cardiology, neurology, and others, with the oncology segment holding the largest market share in 2021.

Overall, we believe that the recent technological developments in radiopharmaceuticals, including promising new alpha-emitting candidates, will continue to provide supportive tailwinds to this sector. As a result, management believes that it is well positioned to capitalize on these future opportunities.

History of CycloSam^® development and past studies and trials

The Company has an exclusive worldwide patent and technology License Agreement for CycloSam^®. The New Technology was developed at IsoTherapeutics Group, LLC (“IsoTherapeutics”) by its founders Jim Simone, PhD and R. Keith Frank, PhD (the “Inventors”). The Inventors also developed one of the first commercial radiopharmaceuticals on the market, Quadramet®, approved by the FDA in 1997 for pain palliation. Drs. Simone and Frank each have over 30 years of experience in radiopharmaceuticals publishing more than 100 papers and authoring over 60 patents in the field. The Inventors spent much of their careers at Dow Chemical Company prior to divestiture of its radiopharmaceutical business. According to the Inventors, CycloSam^® was developed to address the shortcomings of other radiopharmaceuticals, including Quadramet, such as toxicity, saturation effects, long-lived impurities, and supply-chain complexities.

Prior generation Quadramet vs Improvements in CycloSam^®. CycloSam^® is a second-generation bone-seeking radiopharmaceutical based on Quadramet. Although Quadramet was clinically proven to be effective for pain palliation associated with metastatic bone cancer, the toxicity of the drug made repeat doses undesirable. Therefore, Quadramet’s use has been limited to pain control, not tumor reduction, elimination or disease modification. The loose binding affinity of Quadramet’s chelating agent, EDTMP, means the ratio of chelant to Samarium-153 is extremely high (~300:1). This resulting problem of bone saturation prohibits usage of Quadramet in high doses required for treatment of bone cancer or bone marrow ablation. Additionally, high levels of impurities from the Samarium-153 production, namely Europium-154, made repeated dosing of Quadramet undesirable. Lastly, Quadramet faced supply-chain and distribution limitations because the Samarium-153 it uses could only be accessed from the reactor once per week. We believe that because of these challenges, Quadramet demonstrated limited market success, and to our knowledge, was recently discontinued by its manufacturer and distributor. We believe CycloSam^® overcomes these inherent limitations of Quadramet in terms of toxicity, usage, and availability.

The Vienna Protocol – Precedent of Efficacy. In August 2011, Dr. Helmut Sinzinger published a study in the Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, which demonstrated that despite the described limitations of Samarium-153 EDTMP (Quadramet®), it could still be used to effectively treat bone metastasis.

The Vienna Protocol, as it was labeled, was based on a 550 patient study developed by Dr. Sinzinger to deliver therapeutic doses of Quadramet® on a periodic low dose basis balancing hematological toxicity and europium buildup with clinical results. The specific regimen used very low doses of the predecessor drug (30 mCi) on an outpatient basis. The treatment was administered at three month intervals during the first year, followed by another five treatments at six month intervals, then five therapies at nine month intervals, and then annually indefinitely. The dosing schedule was driven by hematological concerns and constant monitoring was required.

During Dr. Sinzinger’s trials, a wide range of positive clinical responses were seen including arrested tumor growth and even regression of the cancer in the bone. Some patients were treated for over five years exhibiting significant clinical response. While effective, this regimen required significant time on the part of both the physician and patient both of which were considered overly burdensome. Although this study was well published and the efficacy results were promising, wide clinical adoption did not occur due to the overall effort that was required to deliver a true therapeutic dose while avoiding the toxicity issues. Quadramet was never approved by the FDA for the treatment of bone cancer, but rather, just for pain management associated with the disease.

Improvements of CycloSam® over Predecessor Drug

CycloSam® is a new, advanced generation Samarium-153 drug with a dramatically different clinical profile than Quadramet®. By producing the Samarium-153 in a different part of the nuclear reactor, the decay by-product Europium has shown in studies to be nearly non-existent, thus eliminating long-term buildup concerns [Source: IsoTherapeutics Group. (2021). Preparation and Stability of CycloSam® Sm-153-DOTMP. (Report No. QSM-1)]. Secondly, the superior binding affinity of the new chelating agent, DOTMP, means more energy can be delivered to the target, thus minimizing off-target concerns. Further, the method of harvesting the patented low specific activity Samarium-153 means it can be accessed on a daily basis, compared to weekly for Quadramet®, at a reduced cost. We believe that all of these clinical and manufacturing improvements were achieved without any reduction in either the tumor killing power of Samarium-153 or its ability to travel deep into the bone tumor.

Potential Market Indications for CycloSam®.

CycloSam’s therapeutic profile and presumed advantages over other radiopharmaceuticals, including Quadramet, translate to several potential key market indications as detailed in the following table:

Source: American Cancer Society estimates of new cases reported each year in the United States. Data as of July 2020.

Bone metastases arise in about 5% of all types of cancer, 29% of patients with multiple myeloma (15,000), 16% of lung (37,000), 6% of prostate (48,000) and 7% of breast cancers (70,000). Roughly 70% of patients with bone metastases will experience bone pain, and many are at risk for skeletal-related events including fracture and spinal cord compression. The total annual cost for treatment of metastatic bone disease is approximately $12.7 billion or 17% of the total of $74 billion that was spent on direct medical costs of these cancers [Source: Schulman KL, Kohles J. Economic burden of metastatic bone disease in the U.S. Cancer. 2007 Jun 1;109(11):2334-42. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22678. PMID: 17450591]. In addition to metastatic bone cancers, according to the National Institute of Health SEER, there are approximately 14,000 people living with osteosarcoma in the US at any one time [Source: Damron TA, Ward WG, Stewart A. Osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and Ewing’s sarcoma: National Cancer Data Base Report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Jun;459:40-7. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318059b8c9. PMID: 17414166, and National Cancer Institute: Surveilance, E., and End Results Program Cancer Stat Facts: Bone and Joint Cancer, <https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/bones.html> (2020)] and their cost of care is estimated to exceed $100,000 per patient [Source: American Cancer Society. Key Statistics About Bone Cancer].

Metastatic bone cancer is currently incurable, and therefore palliation and arrest or deceleration of the progress of disease are important near-term goals. Quadramet® (Samarium-153-EDTP) and Metastron^TM (89Sr chloride) were approved by the FDA for pain palliation resulting from osteoblastic bone metastases, but their widespread acceptance and use is hampered by concern about the perceived risk of myelosuppression when administered concurrently with chemotherapy. Xofigo, an alpha particle emitter, was approved in May 2013 and initially was expected to capture significant market share rapidly; however, the product has only recently proven market success after many additional clinical trials.

Osteosarcoma is the most common childhood and adolescent/young adult (ages 15-39) primary high-grade bone malignancy [Source: Taran SJ, Taran R, Malipatil NB. Pediatric Osteosarcoma: An Updated Review. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2017;38(1):33-43. doi:10.4103/0971-5851.203513]. Patients can often have metastatic cancer at diagnosis, and metastasis to the lungs is often fatal for these patients. For patients who develop or present with metastatic cancer in this diagnosis, the 5-year survival rate is 66% [Source: Osteosarcoma - Childhood and Adolescence - Statistics.” Cancer.Net, 30 Sept. 2021, https://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/osteosarcoma-childhood-and-adolescence/statistics]. Osteosarcoma standard-of-care usually involves chemotherapy which has substantial negative side effects, or drastic surgeries such as limb salvage or amputation. Osteosarcoma is relatively resistant to External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT), and currently approved radiopharmaceutical therapeutics fall short due to myelotoxicity and long-lived radioactive impurities. There is a tremendous unmet need for a better treatment that is more efficacious against pediatric osteosarcoma and better tolerated by patients.

Preclinical and Clinical Studies

Preclinical Studies. Preclinical toxicology studies of CycloSam^® in rats and dogs have shown that a single intravenous dose of non-radioactive Samarium-153 DOTMP elicited no significant systemic toxicity. Skeletal uptake has also been studied in rats over a wide range of doses to determine whether CycloSam^® displays a similar saturation effect which has been observed in studies of Samarium-153 EDTMP (aka Quadramet). In the rat saturation study, no statistically significant difference was found in uptake as a function of increased dosage of CycloSam^®.

In addition to rat and dog toxicological studies, a proof-of-concept study was conducted in ten dogs with spontaneously occurring bone cancer treated with 1-2 mCi/kg of CycloSam^®. Treatment was well tolerated with seven dogs treated at a dose of 1 mCi/kg and one dog treated with 2 mCi/kg who did not experience a dose limiting toxicity. One dog treated with 2 mCi/kg and one dog treated with 2.3 mCi/kg experienced grade 4 asymptomatic thrombocytopenia and neutropenia; which refers to a manageable depressed level of platelets and neutrophils in the blood. Results from these preclinical studies suggested CycloSam^® has potential as a therapeutic agent in the treatment of primary bone cancer and metastatic bone disease.

Safety/Tox Studies. Non-radioactive CycloSam^® has been through a full-scale 14-day, acute toxicological study in both rats and dogs. This study was designed to determine the toxicokinetics of the product at four different dose levels that are higher than expected to be used in the current clinical trials. The studies showed no systemic toxicity in either of the species with a single intravenous administration of CycloSam^® (non-radioactive). Some mild to moderate allergic-like responses were seen in dogs at the highest dose, which is much higher than would be expected for clinical use.

Non-clinical testing. Rat and rabbit pharmacology and targeted bone pharmacology studies have been undertaken and published in both patents and in the literature for Samarium-153-DOTMP and their preclinical results demonstrated significant skeletal uptake fractions. We believe these studies suggest CycloSam^® has promise as a bone seeking radiopharmaceutical.

Clinical Pharmacology. The majority of non-clinical pharmacology studies with CycloSam^® have been done in rats. When administered through the tail vein, much of the Samarium-153-DOTMP binds to the bone; the half-life is 46.3 hours, but the portion of the drug not bound to bone or calcified tissue is completely eliminated through the kidneys within 6 hours of administration. Two additional studies in dogs with osteosarcoma have also elicited promising results, and confirm bone uptake, preliminary safety, and preliminary clinical benefit against bone tumor. Preclinical results demonstrated significant skeletal uptake fractions.

Clinical Studies. CycloSam^® was recently studied for the first time in humans under a Single Patient Investigational New Drug (IND) for Emergency Use at the Cleveland Clinic. The patient, a 25 year-old male who suffered from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and high-risk osteosarcoma, received a single low dose of 1 mCi/kg of CycloSam^® on March 24, 2020 for dosimetry. This was followed seven days later on March 31, 2020 by a single high dose of 32 mCi/kg (1919 mCi) of CycloSam^®. No injection site effects were noted at the time of injection. At 48 hours post-injection of the second dose there was no renal toxicity observed. The estimated dose delivered to the skeleton was 40 Gy with bone lesion uptake of 60 Gy. The abbreviation Gy stands for “gray”, which is a measurement of radiation reaching the target. In this instance, a 45 Gy is considered required to deliver the radiation to the target, and therefore, 60 Gy was considered very good. The patient received an allogeneic stem cell transfusion two weeks following high dose injection of Samarium-153 DOTMP; however, the stem cell transplant failed to fully engraft. The patient, who was terminally ill prior to the treatment, passed away on August 18, 2020, a month after bone marrow ablation and after additional procedures not using a radiopharmaceutical were performed, from complications of an infection unrelated to the infusion of CycloSam^® according to the investigator.

The investigator concluded that high-dose CycloSam^® can be given safely with no apparent renal toxicity and no unexpected adverse events attributable to Samarium-153 DOTMP. Skeletal targeting with sparing of other tissues was observed after the high dose. This was only a single patient human clinical trial, and the patient did not survive long enough for full observation, so additional safety and efficacy clinical trial data will have to be developed.

License Agreement, Collaborations and Partnerships

Collaborations, partnerships and similar agreements, including license agreements, are a key component of the Company’s corporate strategy. As a clinical stage biotechnology company without revenue, partnerships are an essential part of our future development.

License Agreement. The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary QSAM Therapeutics, entered into an exclusive worldwide patent and technology License Agreement with IGL Pharma, Inc. (“IGL”) on April 20, 2020 with respect to the innovative work of Jim Simone, PhD and R. Keith Frank, PhD, at IsoTherapeutics on Samarium-153 DOTMP. IGL is an affiliated company with IsoTherapeutics, and the President of IGL, Richard Piazza, also serves as our Executive Chairman. We amended the License Agreement on November 24, 2021.

Our License Agreement, as amended, with IGL is for 20 years or until the expiration of the multiple patents covered under the license and requires multiple milestone-based payments including: up to $410,000 as CycloSam^® advances through Phase 3 of clinical trials, and $2 million upon commercialization. IGL has also received 500,000 shares of the Company as additional compensation. Upon commercialization, IGL will receive an on-going royalty equal to 4.5% of Net Sales, as defined in the License Agreement, and 5% of any consideration we receive pursuant to a sublicense, sale of the asset, or sale of QSAM Therapeutics. We will also pay for ongoing patent filing and maintenance fees, and we have certain requirements to defend the patents against infringement claims. The parties have agreed to mutual indemnification.

Either party may terminate the License Agreement 30 days after notice in the event of an uncured breach, or immediately in the case of bankruptcy or insolvency of the other party. QSAM Therapeutics may terminate for any reason upon 30 days’ notice. In the case IGL terminates due to an uncured breach, IGL will repay to us 25% of our direct clinical costs to assume ownership of data and other information gained in that process.

In connection with the License Agreement, QSAM Therapeutics signed a two-year Consulting and Confidentiality Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) with IGL, which provides IGL with payments of $8,500 per month continuing through April 2022. The Consulting Agreement is to provide us with additional consulting and advisory services from the technology’s founders to assist in the clinical development of CycloSam^®. Our Executive Chairman serves as President of IGL, receives a $500 per month fee, and holds options to acquire less than 1% equity stake in IGL.

Contracted Research Organization. In January 2020, our licensor, IGL Pharma, entered into a Master Services Agreement (MSA) with a full-service Contract Research Organization (CRO) with over a 30 year history of service to pharmaceutical and biotechnology clients. The MSA was amended in February 2021 to add QSAM as a party and includes a fixed monthly retainer for regulatory and clinical trial consulting services as well as specific work orders for clinical trial execution services. The CRO has a full-time staff of project managers, statisticians, physicians, nurses and other regulatory and operational personnel to support our FDA interactions, filings and preclinical and clinical trial activities. Specifically, the CRO provides clinical trial management services, clinical study monitoring services, medical coding services, electronic data capture services, data management services, medical monitoring services, safety reporting and medical writing services.

Legacy Business and Separation Agreement

Until November 2020, our primary business was acquiring and managing companies in the soil health sector (the “Legacy Business”), through an affiliated company, Earth Property Holdings LLC (“EPH”). In January 2020, our board of directors authorized a strategic plan comprised of: (1) securing new technologies and business opportunities in the broader biosciences sector, and (2) significantly reducing debt and liabilities of the Company, both of which have been accomplished. The first action under this plan included appointing Douglas R. Baum to our board of directors. Mr. Baum has over 28 years of experience in the bioscience and biotech industries, including development, commercialization and marketing of multiple drugs and medical devices. After his appointment to our board, Mr. Baum secured for the Company an Exclusive Dealing Option Agreement to provide us a 90-day period to negotiate with IGL Pharma Inc. (“IGL”) for a license to CycloSam^®. IGL is an affiliated entity of IsoTherapeutics Group LLC, whose founders created Quadramet® (Samarium-153-EDTMP) while working at Dow Chemical Company, one of the first effective commercial radiopharmaceuticals.

On April 20, 2020, we exercised our option and executed a Patent and Technology License Agreement and Trademark Assignment with IGL, through a newly created, wholly-owned subsidiary called QSAM Therapeutics Inc. (“QSAM Therapeutics”). The License Agreement, which was amended on November 24, 2021, provides us with exclusive, worldwide and sub-licensable rights to all of IGL’s patents, product data and knowhow with respect to CycloSam^®. The License Agreement also transfers to us the rights to the product name CycloSam® for the technology and provides us a first right of refusal to license other IsoTherapeutics’ technologies in the future. See “License Agreement” above.

Our board of directors determined in the fourth quarter of 2020 that the opportunities presented through the development of the New Technology presented shareholders with the best path forward in terms of long term value creation. As a result, on November 6, 2020, we entered into an Omnibus Separation Agreement (the “Separation Agreement”) with EPH. Under the terms of the Separation Agreement, all remaining assets for the Legacy Business were transferred to EPH in return for the release and termination of $993,985 in debt and other liabilities owed to EPH. An additional $114,700 in promissory notes plus accrued interest owed to an affiliate of EPH were converted into Company common stock. Under the Separation Agreement, the Management Agreement between the Company and EPH was terminated, and former employees of the Company engaged in the Legacy Business were released from non-compete agreements. We have presented revenue and expenses related to the Management Agreement, as well as other expenses, assets and liabilities related to the Legacy Business, as “discontinued operations” in our consolidated financial statements. Our sole business focus at this time is the development of radiopharmaceuticals for the treatment of cancer and other diseases.

Government Regulation and Product Approval

Clinical trials, the drug approval process, and the marketing of drugs are intensively regulated in the United States and in all major foreign countries. In the United States, the FDA regulates drugs under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), and related regulations. Drugs are also subject to other federal, state, and local statutes and regulations. Failure to comply with the applicable U.S. regulatory requirements at any time during the product development process, approval process or after approval may subject an applicant to administrative or judicial sanctions. These sanctions could include the imposition by the FDA Institutional Review Board (“IRB”) of a clinical hold on trials, the FDA’s refusal to approve pending applications or supplements, withdrawal of an approval, warning letters, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunctions, fines, civil penalties or criminal prosecution. Any agency or judicial enforcement action could have a material adverse effect on us.

The FDA and comparable regulatory agencies in state and local jurisdictions and in foreign countries impose substantial requirements upon the clinical development, manufacture and marketing of biopharmaceutical products. These agencies and other federal, state, and local entities regulate research and development activities and the testing, manufacture, quality control, safety, effectiveness, labeling, storage, distribution, record keeping, approval, advertising, and promotion of product we develop in the future.

The FDCA and/or FDA’s policies may change, and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent or delay regulatory approval of any candidate drug product or approval of new disease indications or label changes. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of adverse governmental regulation that might arise from future legislative or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad.

Marketing Approval

The process required by the FDA before new drugs may be marketed in the United States generally involves the following:

The testing and approval process requires substantial time and financial resources, and we cannot be certain that any approvals will be granted on a timely basis if at all.

We will need to successfully complete additional clinical trials in order to be in a position to submit an NDA to the FDA. Future trials may not begin or be completed on schedule, if at all. Trials can be delayed for a variety of reasons, including delays in:

We must reach an agreement with the FDA on the proposed protocols for our future clinical trials, post-market safety monitoring, and on a Pediatric Development Plan in the United States. All new drugs now require the presentation to the FDA after Phase II clinical trials have ended of a Pediatric Development Plan outlining the strategy and steps to be taken by us to study CycloSam® in children as appropriate. A separate submission to the FDA must be made for each successive clinical trial to be conducted during product development. Further, an independent IRB for each site proposing to conduct the clinical trial must review and approve the plan for any clinical trial before it commences at that site. Informed consent must also be obtained from each study subject. Regulatory authorities, an IRB, a data safety monitoring board, or the sponsor may suspend or terminate a clinical trial at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the participants are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Such risks may include unexpected or serious adverse events, or increased severity or occurrence rate of know potential adverse events.

FDA Post-Approval Requirements

Any products manufactured or distributed by us pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to continuing regulation by the FDA, including requirements for record-keeping and reporting of adverse experiences with the drug and/or additional post-market clinical trials. Drug manufacturers are required to register their facilities with the FDA and certain state agencies and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and certain state agencies for compliance with cGMPs, which impose certain quality processes, manufacturing controls, and documentation requirements upon us and our third-party manufacturers in order to ensure that the product is safe, has the identity and strength, and meets the quality and purity characteristics that it purports to have. Under the federal Prescription Drug Marketing Act, the sampling and distribution and tracking of drugs is regulated. It is designed to discourage the sale of counterfeit, adulterated, misbranded, subpotent, and expired prescription drugs. Certain states also impose requirements on manufacturers and distributors to establish the pedigree of product in the chain of distribution, including some states that require manufacturers and others to adopt new technology capable of tracking and tracing product as it moves through the distribution chain. We cannot be certain that we or our present or future suppliers will be able to comply with the cGMP and other FDA regulatory requirements. If our present or future suppliers are not able to comply with these requirements, the FDA may halt our clinical trials, fail to approve any NDA or other application, require us to recall a drug from distribution, shut down manufacturing operations or withdraw approval of the NDA for that drug. Noncompliance with cGMP or other requirements can result in issuance of warning letters, civil and criminal penalties, seizures, and injunctive action.

Labeling, Marketing and Promotion

The FDA closely regulates the labeling, marketing, and promotion of drugs. While doctors are free to prescribe any drug approved by the FDA for any use, a company can only make claims relating to the safety and efficacy of a drug that are consistent with FDA approval and may only actively market a drug only for the particular use and treatment approved by the FDA. In addition, any claims we make for our products in advertising or promotion must be appropriately balanced with important safety information and otherwise be adequately substantiated. Failure to comply with these requirements can result in adverse publicity, warning letters, corrective advertising, injunctions, and potential civil and criminal penalties. Government regulators recently have increased their scrutiny of the promotion and marketing of drugs.

Pediatric Research Equity Act

The Pediatric Research Equity Act (“PREA”) amended the FDCA to authorize the FDA to require certain research into drugs used in pediatric patients. The intent of the PREA is to compel sponsors whose drugs have pediatric applicability to study those drugs in pediatric populations, rather than ignoring pediatric indications for adult indications that could be more economically desirable. The Secretary of Health and Human Services may defer or waive these requirements under specified circumstances. The FDA may decide that an NDA will be approved only following completion of additional pediatric studies.

Anti-Kickback and False Claims Laws

In the United States, the research, manufacturing, distribution, sale and promotion of drug products and medical devices are potentially subject to regulation by various federal, state and local authorities in addition to the FDA, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, other divisions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (e.g., the Office of Inspector General), the U.S. Department of Justice, state Attorneys General, and other state and local government agencies. For example, sales, marketing, and scientific/educational grant programs must comply with the Anti-Kickback Statute, the False Claims Act, as amended, the privacy regulations promulgated under HIPAA, and similar state laws. Pricing and rebate programs must comply with the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program requirements of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, as amended, and the Veterans Health Care Act of 1992, as amended. If products are made available to authorized users of the Federal Supply Schedule of the General Services Administration, additional laws and requirements apply. All of these activities are also potentially subject to federal and state consumer protection and unfair competition laws.

In the United States, we are subject to complex laws and regulations pertaining to healthcare “fraud and abuse,” including, but not limited to, the Anti-Kickback Statute, the federal False Claims Act, and other state and federal laws and regulations. The Anti-Kickback Statute makes it illegal for any person, including a prescription drug manufacturer (or a party acting on its behalf) to knowingly and willfully solicit, receive, offer, or pay any remuneration that is intended to induce the referral of business, including the purchase, order, or prescription of a particular drug, for which payment may be made under a federal healthcare program, such as Medicare or Medicaid.

The federal civil False Claims Act prohibits, among other things, any person or entity from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment to or approval by the federal government or knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim to the federal government. A claim includes “any request or demand” for money or property presented to the U.S. government. Violations of the False Claims Act can result in very significant monetary penalties and treble damages. The federal government is using the False Claims Act, and the accompanying threat of significant liability, in its investigation and prosecution of pharmaceutical companies throughout the country, for example, in connection with the promotion of products for unapproved uses and other sales and marketing practices. The government has obtained multi-million and multi-billion-dollar settlements under the False Claims Act in addition to individual criminal convictions under applicable criminal statutes. In addition, the federal civil monetary penalties statute imposes penalties against any person or entity that, among other things, is determined to have presented or caused to be presented a claim to a federal health program that the person knows or should know is for an item or service that was not provided as claimed or is false or fraudulent. Given the significant size of actual and potential settlements, it is expected that the government will continue to devote substantial resources to investigating healthcare providers’ and manufacturers’ compliance with applicable fraud and abuse laws. The federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), also created new federal criminal statutes that prohibit knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, including private third-party payors and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services. Similar to the Anti-Kickback Statute a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of these statutes or specific intent to violate them in order to have committed a violation.

There are also an increasing number of state laws that require manufacturers to make reports to states on pricing and marketing information. Many of these laws contain ambiguities as to what is required to comply with the laws. In addition, a similar federal requirement Section 6002 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act (the “Affordable Care Act”) commonly referred to as the “Physician Payments Sunshine Act” requires manufacturers to track and report to the federal government certain payments and “transfers of value” made to physicians and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members, made in the previous calendar year. There are a number of states that have various types of reporting requirements as well. These laws may affect our sales, marketing, and other promotional activities by imposing administrative and compliance burdens on us. In addition, given the lack of clarity with respect to these laws and their implementation, our reporting actions could be subject to the penalty provisions of the pertinent state, and soon federal, authorities.

Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act

Historically in the United States, policy makers have attempted several healthcare reforms regarding the healthcare system that could expand access to healthcare, improve quality of healthcare, contain healthcare costs, prevent or delay approval of product candidates, restrict or regulate post-approval activities, and affect the profitable sale of drugs.

In the United States, the pharmaceutical industry has been a particular focus of these efforts and has been significantly affected by major legislative initiatives. In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, collectively referred to as the ACA, was passed, which substantially changed the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers, and significantly affected the pharmaceutical industry. Since its enactment, there have been judicial and political challenges to certain aspects of the ACA. Most recently on June 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a judicial challenge to the ACA brought by several states without specifically ruling on the constitutionality of the ACA. Prior to the Supreme Court’s decision, President Biden issued an executive order to initiate a special enrollment period from February 15, 2021 through August 15, 2021 for purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage through the ACA marketplace. The executive order also instructed certain governmental agencies to review and reconsider their existing policies and rules that limit access to healthcare, including among others, reexamining Medicaid demonstration projects and waiver programs that include work requirements, and policies that create unnecessary barriers to obtaining access to health insurance coverage through Medicaid or the ACA. It is unclear how the healthcare reform measures of the Biden administration or other efforts, if any, to challenge, repeal or replace the ACA will impact the ACA.

Congress and the Biden administration have generally indicated that they will continue to seek new legislative and/or administrative measures to control drug costs and improve access. Individual states in the United States have also become increasingly active in implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine which drugs and suppliers will be included in their healthcare programs. Furthermore, there has been increased interest by third party payors and governmental authorities in reference pricing systems and publication of discounts and list prices.

Other Regulations

We are also subject to numerous federal, state and local laws relating to such matters as safe working conditions, manufacturing practices, environmental protection, fire hazard control, and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances. We may incur significant costs to comply with such laws and regulations now or in the future.

The CycloSam^® radioactive product is regulated by the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and also by similar state regulatory agencies. The handling, packaging, shipping, transportation, and disposal of radioactive materials is highly regulated, and those regulations can change, and the Company would have to comply with all requirements, which could be costly. Additionally, if overnight delivery failures occur, the radioactive compounds cannot be used, and that can result in substantial increased costs and liabilities. The disposal of radioactive materials is also regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and also by similar state regulatory agencies and the Company would have to comply with all of those requirements, which could also be costly.

Radioactive waste from the medical sector is an environmental concern from a global perspective. However, most studies have concluded that radioactive material from the medical sector does not present a significant long term waste management problem when compared to wastes generated from nuclear fuel cycle operations. This is primarily due to the characteristics of biomedical waste, such as its short half-life and low radiotoxicity. For instance, Samarium-153 has a half-life of approximately 46 hours. Biomedical waste also typically contains low energy emitters, such as beta and gamma isotopes, and is generally of low total and specific activity. Further considerations are the volumes of this waste and any other hazardous properties associated with the waste such as biological and chemical risks.

Regardless of the relatively low risks in the preparation, use and disposal of medical isotopes, entities that handle such materials should implement an effective program for biomedical radioactive waste management based on the principles of waste prevention and minimization, while providing for the protection of personnel and the environment, consistent with the requirements of applicable regulatory authorities. This assessment should include an analysis of the total radionuclide inventory and pattern of use, waste types and amounts generated and the potential routes for disposal.

We seek to assure that the nuclear reactor facilities that produce its Samarium-153, as well as the nuclear pharmacies that prepare doses for treatment, have proper and effective waste management procedures in place applicable to the risks presented by the actual material. Further, doctors and trial sites who handle radioactive materials must be educated on the dangers of handling hazardous substances and the proper methods of disposing radioactive or formally radioactive waste, similar to the handling of other medical and bio wastes.

Facilities

The Company currently conducts its business from offices in Austin, Texas and Palm Beach, Florida. The Company’s office space in Austin is leased month-to-month at a rate of $216 per month. The Company has no formal agreement for its Florida space which is leased by Greenblock Capital, a company for which our General Counsel is affiliated.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we may be involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We are not presently a party to any legal proceedings that, in the opinion of management, would have a material adverse effect on our business. Regardless of outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us due to defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources, negative publicity and reputation harm, and other factors.

Smaller Reporting Company

We are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 of the Exchange Act, and subject to the disclosure requirements of Regulation S-K of the SEC, as a “smaller reporting company.” That designation will relieve us of some of the informational requirements of Regulation S-K.

Sarbanes/Oxley Act

Except for the limitations excluded by the JOBS Act discussed under the preceding heading “Emerging Growth Company,” we are also subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Sarbanes/Oxley Act created a strong and independent accounting oversight board to oversee the conduct of auditors of public companies and strengthens auditor independence. It also requires steps to enhance the direct responsibility of senior members of management for financial reporting and for the quality of financial disclosures made by public companies; establishes clear statutory rules to limit, and to expose to public view, possible conflicts of interest affecting securities analysts; creates guidelines for audit committee members’ appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of public companies’ auditors; management assessment of our internal controls; prohibits certain insider trading during pension fund blackout periods; requires companies and auditors to evaluate internal controls and procedures; and establishes a federal crime of securities fraud, among other provisions. Compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act will substantially increase our legal and accounting costs.

Exchange Act Reporting Requirements

Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act requires all companies with securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, like we are, to comply with the rules and regulations of the SEC regarding proxy solicitations, as outlined in Regulation 14A. Matters submitted to shareholders at a special or annual meeting thereof or pursuant to a written consent will require us to provide our shareholders with the information outlined in Schedules 14A (where proxies are solicited) or 14C (where consents in writing to the action have already been received or anticipated to be received) of Regulation 14, as applicable; and preliminary copies of this information must be submitted to the SEC at least 10 days prior to the date that definitive copies of this information are forwarded to our shareholders.

We are also required to file annual reports on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q with the SEC on a regular basis, and will be required to timely disclose certain material events (e.g., changes in corporate control; acquisitions or dispositions of a significant amount of assets other than in the ordinary course of business; and bankruptcy) in a Current Report on Form 8-K.

Number of Total Employees and Number of Full Time Employees

As of the date of this Annual Report, we have four full-time employees. Our interim CFO is currently part-time, but has agreed to join the Company on a full time basis as Chief Financial Officer upon the closing of the Company’s next fund raising.

In 2022 and subject to adequate funding, we seek to provide our employees with health care coverage and other benefits to help attract and maintain our workforce. We are not currently obligated to provide health insurance, however, we believe this is an important addition to our benefits package. All employees receive at least three weeks of paid time off per year. We have historically provided incentive stock options and other equity incentives to officers, directors and key employees to provide ownership and alignment of interests with our shareholders. We also use in certain instances performance-based vesting for stock options, whereby we set milestones to reflect important value creating initiatives of the Company. As a company, we seek diversity and inclusion in our workplace.

Available Information

We maintain an internet website at www.qsambio.com. We make available on or through our website, free of charge, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practical after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not intend the address of our website to be an active link or to otherwise incorporate the contents of our website into this Annual Report. You may also find all of the reports that we have filed electronically with the SEC at their Internet site www.sec.gov.

Item 1a. Risk Factors

General Risks Related to our Business and Technology

Drug development is a long and inherently uncertain process with a high risk of failure at every stage of development.

Drug development is a highly uncertain scientific and medical endeavor, and failure can unexpectedly occur at any stage of clinical development. Typically, there is a high rate of attrition for product candidates in preclinical and clinical trials due to scientific feasibility, safety, efficacy, changing standards of medical care and other variables. Pre-clinical studies and clinical trials are long, expensive and highly uncertain processes that can take many years. It will take us several years to complete our clinical trials and the time required for completing, testing and obtaining approvals is uncertain. The start or end of a clinical trial is often delayed or halted due to changing regulatory requirements, manufacturing challenges, required clinical trial administrative actions, slower than anticipated patient enrollment, changing standards of care, availability or prevalence of use of a comparator drug or required prior therapy, clinical outcomes, or financial constraints. The FDA and other U.S. and foreign regulatory agencies have substantial discretion, at any phase of development, to terminate clinical trials, require additional clinical development or other testing, delay, condition or withhold registration and marketing approval and mandate product withdrawals, including recalls. Additionally, we may also amend, suspend or terminate clinical trials at any time if we believe that the participating patients are being exposed to unacceptable health risks. Results attained in our single early human clinical trial may not be indicative of results in later clinical trials. Our failure to demonstrate adequately the safety and efficacy of a product under development would delay or prevent marketing approval, which could adversely affect our operating results and credibility. The failure of one or more of our product candidates could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The future of our business and operations depends on the success of our development and commercialization programs.

Our business and operations entail a variety of serious risks and uncertainties and are inherently risky. The development programs on which we focus involve novel approaches to treating bone cancer and related diseases. Our product candidates are in clinical development, and in some respects, involve technologies with which we have limited prior experience. We are subject to the risks of failure inherent in the development and commercialization of product candidates based on new technologies. There is some precedent for the successful commercialization of products based on our technologies, but there are still a number of technological challenges that we must overcome to complete our clinical trials and development efforts. We may not be able to successfully develop our product candidates. We must successfully complete clinical trials and obtain regulatory approvals for potential commercial products. Once approved, if at all, commercial product sales are subject to general and industry-specific local and international economic, regulatory, technological and policy developments and trends. Delays, higher costs or other weaknesses in the manufacturing process or any of our contracted manufacturing organizations could hinder the development and commercialization of our product pipeline. The oncology space in which we operate presents numerous significant risks and uncertainties that may be expected to increase to the extent it becomes more competitive or less favored in the commercial healthcare marketplace.

We currently have no in-house sales, marketing or distribution capabilities and have limited experience in marketing products. We may in the future develop an in-house marketing and sales team, which would require significant capital expenditures, management resources and time. We will have to compete with other pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to recruit, hire, train and retain marketing and sales personnel. If we decide against absorbing marketing and sales responsibilities in-house, we will need to collaborate with third-parties. However, there can be no assurance that such collaborations will be successful or even if they are, they will be profitable for the Company after expending capital resources in fees and expenses. There can be no assurance that we will be able to develop in-house sales and distribution capabilities or establish or maintain relationships with third-party collaborators to commercialize any product.

If we do not obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates on a timely basis, or at all, or if the terms of any approval impose significant restrictions or limitations on use, our business, results of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected. Setbacks in clinical development programs could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Regulatory approvals are necessary to market product candidates and require demonstration of a product’s safety and efficacy through extensive pre-clinical and clinical trials. We may not obtain regulatory approval for product candidates on a timely basis, or at all, and the terms of any approval (which in some countries includes pricing and reimbursement approval) may impose significant restrictions, limitations on use or other commercially unattractive conditions. The process of obtaining FDA and foreign regulatory approvals often takes many years and can vary substantially based upon the type, complexity and novelty of the products involved. We have had only limited experience in filing and pursuing applications and other submissions necessary to gain marketing approvals. Products under development may never obtain marketing approval from the FDA or other regulatory authorities necessary for commercialization.

We or regulators may also amend, suspend or terminate clinical trials if we or they believe that the participating patients are being exposed to unacceptable health risks, and after reviewing trial results, we may abandon projects which we previously believed to be promising for commercial or other reasons unrelated to patient risks. During this process, we may find, for example, that results of pre-clinical studies are inconclusive or not indicative of results in human clinical trials, clinical investigators or contract research organizations do not comply with protocols or applicable regulatory requirements, or that product candidates do not have the desired efficacy or have undesirable side effects or other characteristics that preclude marketing approval or limit their potential commercial use if approved. In such circumstances, the entire development program for that product candidate could be adversely affected, resulting in delays in trials or regulatory filings for further marketing approval and a possible need to reconfigure our clinical trial programs to conduct additional trials or abandon the program involved. Conducting additional clinical trials or making significant revisions to a clinical development plan would lead to delays in regulatory filings. If clinical trials indicate, or regulatory bodies are concerned about, actual or possible serious problems with the safety or efficacy of a product candidate, we may stop or significantly slow development or commercialization of affected products. As a result of such concerns, the development programs for our product candidates may be significantly delayed or terminated altogether.

The results of our preclinical or initial single patient clinical studies may not be predictive of the results of clinical trials, and the results of any early-stage clinical trials we commence may not be predictive of the results of the later-stage clinical trials. In addition, initial success in clinical trials may not be indicative of results obtained when such trials are completed. There can be no assurance that any of our current or future clinical trials will ultimately be successful or support further clinical development of any of our product candidates. There is a high failure rate for drugs and biologics proceeding through clinical trials.

If the results of any of our clinical trials are not satisfactory or we encounter problems and/or delays enrolling patients, clinical trial supply issues, setbacks in developing drug formulations or in clinical trials, including raw material supply, manufacturing, stability or other difficulties, or issues complying with protocols or applicable regulatory requirements, the entire development program for our product candidates could be adversely affected in a material manner. Moreover, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses and many companies that believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical studies or clinical trials nonetheless failed to obtain FDA approval or approval from foreign regulatory authorities.

Our business is highly dependent on our product candidate, CycloSam^®, and a failure to obtain regulatory approval or successfully commercialize our product could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

In April 2020, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary QSAM Therapeutics entered into an exclusive worldwide patent and technology license agreement and trademark assignment with respect to CycloSam^® and obtained exclusive commercial rights to the patent portfolio developed by IGL Pharma Inc. (“IGL”) (the “Original Agreement”). The agreement was mutually amended on November 24, 2021 (collectively with the Original Agreement referred to hereinafter as the “License Agreement). The License Agreement is terminable in the event of a material breach by us that is not cured within a predefined period of time after notice of the breach is provided to us. If the License Agreement is terminated, the Company will not have further rights to CycloSam^® and will be unable to continue its regulatory approval process or if already commercialized, benefit from the future sales of CycloSam^®. Further, the Company may be liable for damages for the breach and may suffer additional losses, which could adversely impact our financial condition. As of the date of this prospectus, the Company’s focus is to solely develop CycloSam^® and it does not possess licenses to other product candidates. If we do not obtain regulatory approval for CycloSam^® or fail to successfully commercialize CycloSam^®, we currently have no fall back options to continue our business operations unless we secure licenses of or develop alternative drug candidates. There is no assurance that either will occur.

We must design and conduct successful clinical trials for our product candidates to obtain regulatory approval. We rely on third parties to conduct our clinical trials, which reduces our control over their timing, conduct and expense and may expose us to conflicts of interest. Clinical trial results may be unfavorable or inconclusive, and often take longer and cost more than expected.

We have limited internal resources for conducting clinical trials, and we rely on or obtain the assistance of others to design, conduct, supervise, or monitor some or all aspects of some of our clinical trials. In relying on these third parties, we have less control over the timing and other aspects of clinical trials than if we conducted them entirely on our own. Problems with the timeliness or quality of the work of a contract research organization or clinical data management organization may lead us to seek to terminate the relationship and use an alternative service provider. However, making this change may be costly and may delay our trials and contractual restrictions may make such a change difficult or impossible. These third parties may also have relationships with other entities, some of which may be our competitors. In all events, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our clinical trials is conducted in accordance with the general investigational plan and protocols for the trial. The FDA and other foreign regulatory authorities require us to comply with good clinical practices for conducting and recording and reporting the results of clinical trials to assure that data and reported results are credible and accurate and that the rights, integrity, and confidentiality of trial participants are protected. Our reliance on third parties that we do not control does not relieve us of these responsibilities and requirements.

To obtain regulatory approval of our product candidates we must demonstrate through preclinical studies and clinical trials that they are safe and effective. Adverse or inconclusive clinical trial results concerning any of our product candidates that regulators find deficient in scope, design or one or more other material respects, could require additional trials, resulting in increased costs, significant delays in submissions of approval applications, approvals in narrower indications than originally sought, or denials of approval, none of which we can predict. As a result, any projections that we publicly announce of commencement and duration of clinical trials are not certain. Clinical trial delays may occur as a result of slower than anticipated enrollment. Delays can be caused by, among other things, deaths or other adverse medical events; regulatory or patent issues; interim or final results of ongoing clinical trials; failure to enroll clinical sites as expected; competition for enrollment from other clinical trials; scheduling conflicts with participating clinicians and institutions; disagreements, disputes or other matters arising from collaborations; our inability to obtain necessary funding; or manufacturing problems.

A pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease, such as COVID-19, or coronavirus, may materially and adversely affect our business and our financial results.

The COVID-19 pandemic, including the recent surges caused by the “delta variant” and “omicron variant”, has materially affected segments of the global economy and may affect our operations by causing a period of business disruption, supply chain issues, including the potential interruption of our clinical trial activities and delays or disruptions in the supply of our products and product candidates. In addition, there could be a potential effect of COVID-19 to the business at FDA or other health authorities, which could result in delays of reviews and approvals, including with respect to our product candidates.

The continued spread of COVID-19 globally could also adversely impact our clinical trial operations, including our ability to recruit and retain patients and principal investigators and site staff who, as healthcare providers, may have heightened exposure to COVID-19 if an outbreak occurs in their geography. COVID-19, or another infectious disease, could also negatively affect our manufacturing operations, which could result in delays or disruptions in the supply of our product candidates.

We cannot presently predict the scope and severity of any potential business shutdowns or disruptions, but if we or any of the third parties with whom we engage were to experience shutdowns or other business disruptions, our ability to conduct our business in the manner and on the timelines presently planned could be materially and negatively impacted, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and our results of operation and financial condition.

Even if our product candidates obtain marketing approval, our ability to generate revenue will depend upon public perception of radiopharmaceuticals and will be diminished if our products are not accepted in the marketplace, or if we select pricing strategies for our products that are less competitive than those of our competitors, or fail to obtain acceptable prices or an adequate level of reimbursement for products from third-party payers or government agencies.

Adverse events in clinical trials of our product candidates or in clinical trials of others developing similar products and the resulting negative publicity, as well as any other adverse events in the field of radiopharmaceuticals that may occur in the future, could result in a decrease in demand for our products or any product candidates that we may develop. If public perception is influenced by claims that radiopharmaceuticals or specific therapies within radiopharmaceuticals are unsafe, our products or product candidates may not be accepted by the general public or the medical community.

The commercial success of our products will depend upon their acceptance by the medical community and third-party payers as clinically useful, cost effective and safe. Market acceptance of approved products is affected by a wide range of factors including the timing of regulatory approvals, product launches and the presence of generic, over-the-counter or other competitors; the pricing of the product and relative prices of competing products; product development efforts for new indications; the availability of reimbursement for the product; our ability to obtain sufficient commercial quantities of the product; success in arranging for necessary sublicense or distribution relationships; and general and industry-specific local and international economic pressures. If health care providers believe that patients can be managed adequately with alternative, currently available therapies, they may not prescribe our products, especially if the alternative therapies are viewed as more effective, as having a better safety or tolerability profile, as being more convenient to the patient or health care providers or as being less expensive. Third-party insurance coverage may not be available to patients for any products we develop. For pharmaceuticals administered in an institutional setting, the ability of the institution to be adequately reimbursed from government and health administration authorities, private health insurers and other third-party payers could also play a significant role in demand for our products. Significant uncertainty exists as to the reimbursement status of newly-approved pharmaceuticals. Government and other third-party payers increasingly are attempting to contain healthcare costs by limiting both coverage and the level of reimbursement for new drugs and by refusing, in some cases, to provide coverage for uses of approved products for indications for which the FDA has not granted labeling approval. In most foreign markets, pricing and profitability of prescription pharmaceuticals are subject to government control. In the U.S., we expect that there will continue to be a number of federal and state proposals to implement similar government control and that the emphasis on managed care in the U.S. will continue to put pressure on the pricing of pharmaceutical products. Cost control initiatives could decrease the price that we can receive for any products in the future and adversely affect our ability to successfully commercialize our products. If any of our product candidates do not achieve market acceptance, we will likely lose our entire investment in that product candidate.

We are subject to extensive and ongoing regulation, which can be costly and time consuming, may interfere with marketing approval for our product candidates, and can subject us to unanticipated limitations, restrictions, delays and fines.

Our business, products and product candidates are subject to comprehensive regulation by the FDA and comparable authorities in other countries, and include the Sunshine Act under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”). These agencies and other entities regulate the pre-clinical and clinical testing, safety, effectiveness, approval, manufacture, labeling, marketing, export, storage, recordkeeping, advertising, promotion and other aspects of our products and product candidates. We cannot guarantee that approvals of product candidates, processes or facilities will be granted on a timely basis, or at all. If we experience delays or failures in obtaining approvals, commercialization of our product candidates will be slowed or stopped. In addition to these uncertainties, there have been several attempts and public announcements by members of the U.S. Congress to repeal the PPACA and replace it with a curtailed system of tax credits and dissolve an expansion of the Medicaid program. For example, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was enacted in 2017, which, among other things, eliminated the individual mandate requiring most Americans (other than those who qualify for a hardship exemption) to carry a minimum level of health coverage, and became effective January 1, 2019. There is considerable uncertainty regarding the future of the current PPACA framework, and any changes will likely take time to unfold. As such, we cannot predict what effect the PPACA or other healthcare reform initiatives that may be adopted in the future will have on our business.

Even if we obtain regulatory approval for a product candidate, the approval may include significant limitations on indicated uses for which the product could be marketed or other significant marketing restrictions.

If we violate regulatory requirements at any stage, whether before or after marketing approval is obtained, we may be subject to forced removal of a product from the market, product seizure, civil and criminal penalties and other adverse consequences.

Our products may face regulatory, legal or commercial challenges even after approval.

Even if a product receives regulatory approval:

We are increasingly dependent on information technology, and potential cyberattacks, security problems, or other disruption and expanding social media vehicles present new risks.

We rely on information technology networks and systems, including the internet, to process, transmit, and store electronic information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes, including financial transactions and records, billing, and operating data. We may purchase some of our information technology from vendors, on whom our systems will depend, and we rely on commercially available systems, software, tools, and monitoring to provide security for processing, transmission, and storage of confidential operator and other customer information. We depend upon the secure transmission of this information over public networks. Our networks and storage applications could be subject to unauthorized access by hackers or others through cyberattacks, which are rapidly evolving and becoming increasingly sophisticated, or by other means, or may be breached due to operator error, malfeasance or other system disruptions. In some cases, it will be difficult to anticipate or immediately detect such incidents and the damage they cause. Any significant breakdown, invasion, destruction, interruption, or leakage of information from our systems could harm our reputation and business.

In addition, the use of social media could cause us to suffer brand damage or information leakage. Negative posts or comments about us on any social networking website could damage our or our brands’ reputations. Employees or others might disclose non-public sensitive information relating to our business through external media channels, including through the use of social media. The continuing evolution of social media will present us with new challenges and risks.

Risks Related to our Financial Position and Operating History

We have a limited operating history and are operating at a loss, and there is no guaranty that we will become profitable.

We recently began operations under our current business model and anticipate that we will operate at a loss for some time. Since we have limited operating history and no history of profitability, we have limited financial results upon which you may judge our potential. Further, our ability to become profitable depends upon our ability to generate revenue. We have recorded no revenue from continuing operations since inception. We do not expect to generate significant product revenue unless or until we successfully complete clinical development and obtain regulatory approval of, and then successfully commercialize, at least one of our product candidates; or alternatively, out license or sell our drug candidates. Both of these scenarios are highly uncertain. In the future, we may experience under-capitalization, development delays, set-backs with our drug development programs, lack of funding options, setbacks and many of the problems, delays and expenses encountered by any early stage business, many of which are beyond our control. These include, but are not limited to:

Because our history is limited and we are subject to intense competition, any investment in us would be inherently risky.

Because we are a company with limited operational history and no profitability, our business activity is early-staged and subject to numerous risks. The pharmaceutical development business is highly competitive with many companies having access to the similar products and markets. Many of them have greater financial resources and longer operating histories than we have and can be expected to compete within the business in which we engage and intend to engage. There can be no assurance that we will have the necessary resources to become or remain competitive. We are subject to the risks which are common to all companies with a limited history of operations and profitability. Therefore, investors should consider an investment in us to be an extremely risky venture.

There is substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.

The Report of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm issued in connection with our audited consolidated financial statements for the calendar years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern because of our recurring operating losses and our lack of liquidity and working capital. A going concern opinion means that there is substantial doubt that the Company can continue as an ongoing business for the next 12 months. While we expect to become a going concern upon the completion of the Company next planned offering, if we fail to successfully deploy our funds, fail to implement our business plan or commercialize our drug as planned, or fail to raise additional capital when required, there can be no assurance that we will not again lose our ability to continue as a going concern.

We will require additional financing.

Pharmaceutical development is inherently costly and requires significant capital. We expect our expenses to increase significantly as we enter into the next stage of our drug development including steps such as preclinical studies, clinical trials, research and development, and FDA marketing approvals. If we do obtain FDA approval, we expect to incur substantial costs in commercialization of the product. In addition, we will continue to incur costs to operate as a public company. Accordingly, we will need to obtain additional financing in connection with our continuing operations. There can be no assurance that additional funds will be available when and if needed, or on acceptable terms to the Company. If we are unable to obtain such financing, or if the terms thereof are too costly, we may be forced to curtail or cease operations until such time as alternative financing may be arranged, which could have a materially adverse impact on our planned operations and our shareholders’ investment.

Based upon our current operating plan, we believe that the net proceeds from an offering currently planned by the Company, together with our existing cash and cash equivalents, will enable us to fund our operations through at least 2022. In particular, we expect that the net proceeds from such planned offering and our existing cash and cash equivalents will allow us to complete the Phase 1 portion of our planned clinical trials for CycloSam^® used in connection with metastatic bone cancer, and also may allow us to commence or prepare for commencement of clinical trials for additional indications, including primary bone cancer and osteosarcoma. We have based these estimates on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could exhaust our capital resources sooner than we currently expect. Our operating plans and other demands on our cash resources may change as a result of many factors currently unknown to us, and we may need to seek additional funds sooner than planned, through public or private equity or debt financings or other capital sources, including potentially additional collaborations, licenses and other similar arrangements. In addition, our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to raise additional capital in order to implement our current business plan. If the market conditions are favorable or given our strategic considerations, even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans, we may raise additional capital. Attempting to secure additional financing may divert our management from our day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our ability to develop our product candidates.

Our success will be dependent on our management, and the continued service of key employees.

Our success is dependent upon the decision making of our directors and executive officers. We believe that our success depends on the continued service of our key employees and our ability to hire additional key employees when and as needed. Although we currently intend to retain our existing management, we cannot assure you that such individuals will remain with us. Further, we cannot assure that we will be able to find and recruit new employees on terms acceptable to the Company. We have fixed term employment agreements with our three key employees – Messrs. Baum, Piazza and Nelson — but have not obtained key man life insurance on the lives of any of them. The unexpected loss of the services of one or more of our key executives, directors and advisors, or the inability to find new key employees within a reasonable period of time could have a material adverse effect on the economic condition and results of operations of the Company.

Risks Related to Working with Third Parties

We have been and expect to continue to be dependent on collaborators for the development, manufacturing and sales of certain products and product candidates, which expose us to the risk of reliance on these collaborators.

In conducting our operations, we currently depend, and expect to continue to depend, on numerous collaborators. In addition, certain clinical trials for our product candidates may be conducted by government-sponsored agencies, and consequently will be dependent on governmental participation and funding. These arrangements expose us to the same considerations we face when contracting with third parties for our own trials.

If any of our collaborators breach or terminate its agreement with us or otherwise fail to conduct successfully and in a timely manner the collaborative activities for which they are responsible, the preclinical or clinical development or commercialization of the affected product candidate or research program could be delayed or terminated. We generally do not control the amount and timing of resources that our collaborators devote to our programs or product candidates. We also do not know whether current or future collaboration partners, if any, might pursue alternative technologies or develop alternative products either on their own or in collaboration with others, including our competitors, as a means for developing treatments for the diseases or conditions targeted by our collaborative arrangements. Our collaborators are also subject to similar development, regulatory, manufacturing, cyber-security and competitive risks as us, which may further impede their ability to successfully perform the collaborative activities for which they are responsible. Setbacks of these types to our collaborators could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are dependent upon third parties for a variety of functions. These arrangements may not provide us with the benefits we expect.

We rely on third parties to perform a variety of functions. We are party to numerous agreements which place substantial responsibility on clinical research organizations, consultants and other service providers for the development of our product candidates. We also rely on medical and academic institutions to perform aspects of our clinical trials of product candidates. We may not be able to enter new arrangements without undue delays or expenditures, and these arrangements may not allow us to compete successfully. Moreover, if third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines or conduct clinical trials in accordance with regulatory requirements or applicable protocols, our product candidates may not be approved for marketing and commercialization or such approval may be delayed. If that occurs, we or our collaborators will not be able, or may be delayed in our efforts, to commercialize our product candidates.

Our relationships with customers and third-party payers are or may become subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, program exclusion, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings.

Health care providers, physicians and third-party payers play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Our future arrangements with third-party payers and customers will or already do require us and them to comply with broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other health care laws and regulations, including both federal and state anti-kickback and false claims laws, that may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we market, sell and distribute our products that obtain marketing approval. Efforts to ensure that business arrangements comply with applicable health care laws and regulations involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If such operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or other applicable governmental regulations, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and the curtailment or restructuring of related operations. If physicians or other providers or entities involved with our products are found to be not in compliance with applicable laws, they may be subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions, including exclusions from government funded healthcare programs, which may adversely affect us.

If we or our partners are unable to obtain sufficient quantities of the materials needed to make our products or product candidates, development of our products or product candidates or commercialization of our approved products could be slowed or stopped.

We have utilized Missouri University Research Reactor (“MURR”) to procure Samarium-153, a primary ingredient used in manufacturing of CycloSam®, for our recently conducted clinical studies. Samarium-153 is critical to manufacturing of CycloSam® and to our supply-chain process both during our clinical trials and if the product is commercialized. MURR has verbally committed to supply us Samarium-153 in the future and we are expecting to enter into definitive agreements with MURR in 2022. We also plan to qualify additional suppliers in 2022 as part of our supply chain and general business risk diversification strategy. However, if we fail to partner with MURR or secure other partners for supply of Samarium-153 or if our arrangements with a supplier do not satisfy our requirements in the future, it will directly and adversely impact the production of CycloSam®.

We or our partners may not be able to obtain the materials necessary to make a particular product or product candidate in adequate volume and quality. If any materials needed to make a product or product candidate is insufficient in quantity or quality, if a supplier fails to deliver in a timely fashion or at all or if these relationships terminate, we or our partners may not be able to fulfill manufacturing obligations for our products or product candidates, either on our own or through third-party suppliers. A delay or disruption of supplies of our products or product candidates would have a material adverse effect on our business as a whole. Our existing arrangements with suppliers may result in the supply of insufficient quantities of our product candidates needed to accomplish our clinical development programs or commercialization, and we may not have the right and in any event, do not currently have the capability to manufacture these products if our suppliers are unable or unwilling to do so. Some of these raw materials or their starting materials, components or ingredients may come from foreign countries, which can present significant supply chain issues. We currently arrange for supplies of critical raw materials used in production of our product candidates from single sources. We do not have long-term contracts with any of these suppliers. Any delay or disruption in the availability of materials would slow or stop product development and commercialization of the relevant product.

Manufacturing resources could limit or adversely affect our ability to commercialize products.

We or our partners may engage third parties, including nuclear reactor sites, to manufacture our product candidates. We or our partners may not be able to obtain adequate supplies from third-party manufacturers in a timely fashion for development or commercialization purposes, and commercial quantities of products may not be available from contract manufacturing organizations or CMOs at acceptable costs.

In order to commercialize our product candidates successfully, we need to be able to manufacture or arrange for the manufacture of products in commercial quantities, in compliance with regulatory requirements, at acceptable costs and in a timely manner. Manufacture of our product candidates can be complex, difficult to accomplish even in small quantities, difficult to scale-up for large-scale production and subject to delays, inefficiencies and low yields of quality products. The manufacture of radiopharmaceuticals is relatively complex and requires significant capital expenditures. We continue to rely on CMOs for our product candidates. The cost of manufacturing our product candidates may make them prohibitively expensive. If adequate supplies of any of our product candidates or related materials are not available on a timely basis or at all, our clinical trials or commercialization of our product candidates could be seriously delayed, since these materials are time consuming to manufacture and cannot be readily obtained from third-party sources. We continue to be dependent on a limited number of highly specialized manufacturing and development partners, including single source manufacturers for certain of our product candidates. If we were to lose one or more of these key relationships, it could materially adversely affect our business. Establishing new manufacturing relationships, or creating our own manufacturing capability, would require significant time, capital and management effort, and the transfer of product-related technology and know-how from one manufacturer to another is an inherently complex and uncertain process.

Failure of any manufacturer of our various product candidates to comply with applicable regulatory requirements could subject us to penalties and have a material adverse effect on supplies of our product candidates.

Third-party manufacturers are required to comply with current goods manufacturing practice regulations or cGMP or similar regulatory requirements outside of the U.S. If manufacturers of our product candidates cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to the strict regulatory requirements of the FDA and any applicable foreign regulatory authority, they may not be able to supply us with our product candidates. If these facilities are not approved for commercial manufacture, we may need to find alternative manufacturing facilities, which could result in delays of several years in obtaining approval for a product candidate. We do not control the manufacturing operations and are completely dependent on our third-party manufacturing partners or contractors for compliance with the applicable regulatory requirements for the manufacture of some of our product candidates. Manufacturers are subject to ongoing periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and corresponding state and foreign agencies for compliance with cGMP and similar regulatory requirements. Failure of any manufacturer of any of our product candidates to comply with applicable cGMP or other regulatory requirements could result in sanctions being imposed on our collaborators or us, including fines, injunctions, civil penalties, delays, suspensions or withdrawals of approvals, operating restrictions, interruptions in supply and criminal prosecutions, any of which could significantly and adversely affect supplies of our product candidates and have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If the use of hazardous and biological materials by us or third parties, such as CROs or CMOs, in a manner that causes injury or violates applicable law, we may be liable for damages.

Our research and development activities may involve the controlled use of potentially hazardous substances, including radioactive, chemical and biological materials, by us or third parties, such as contract research organizations or CROs and CMOs. Exposure to high levels of radiation can cause acute health effects such as skin burns and acute radiation syndrome (“radiation sickness”). It can also result in long-term health effects such as cancer and cardiovascular disease. We and such third parties are subject to federal, state, and local laws and regulations in the United States governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling, and disposal of medical and hazardous materials. Although we believe that our and such third-parties’ procedures for using, handling, storing and disposing of these materials comply with legally prescribed standards, we cannot completely eliminate the risk of contamination or injury resulting from medical or hazardous materials. In the event of any such contamination or injury, we may incur liability or local, city, state, or federal authorities may curtail the use of these materials and interrupt our business operations. Compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations is expensive, and current or future environmental regulations may impair our research, development and manufacturing efforts, which could harm our business prospects, financial condition, or results of operations. We plan to maintain insurance coverage upon completion of this offering for injuries resulting from the hazardous materials we use; however, future claims may exceed the amount of our coverage. Also, we do not have insurance coverage for pollution cleanup and removal. Currently the costs of complying with such federal, state, provincial, local and foreign environmental regulations are not significant, and consist primarily of waste disposal expenses. However, they could become expensive, and current or future environmental laws or regulations may impair our research, development, production and commercialization efforts. Further, although we maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover us for costs and expenses we may incur due to injuries to our employees resulting from the use of hazardous materials, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. We do not maintain insurance for environmental liability or toxic tort claims that may be asserted against us in connection with our storage or disposal of biological, hazardous or radioactive materials.

Unexpected disruptions could seriously harm our future revenue and financial condition and increase our expenditures.

Our operations, and those of our CROs, CMOs and other contractors and consultants, could be subject to events like earthquakes, power shortages, telecommunications failures, water shortages, floods, hurricanes, typhoons, fires, extreme weather conditions, medical epidemics and other natural or man-made disasters or business interruptions, for which we are predominantly self-insured. The occurrence of any of these business disruptions could seriously harm our operations and financial condition and increase our costs and expenses. We rely on third-party manufacturers to produce and process our product candidates to meet our demands. Our ability to obtain clinical supplies of our product candidates could be disrupted if the operations of these suppliers are affected by a man-made or natural disaster or other business interruption.

Risks Relating to Our Intellectual Property

The validity, enforceability and commercial value of our patents and other intellectual property rights are highly uncertain.

We license a number of issued patents and other patent applications that have not yet been issued. We must obtain, maintain and enforce patent and other rights to protect our intellectual property. The patent position of biotechnology and pharmaceutical firms is highly uncertain and involves many complex legal and technical issues. There are many laws, regulations and judicial decisions that dictate and otherwise influence the manner in which patent applications are filed and prosecuted and in which patents are granted and enforced, all of which are subject to change from time to time. There is no clear policy involving the breadth of claims allowed, or the degree of protection afforded, under patents in this area. Accordingly, patent applications owned by or licensed to us may not result in patents being issued. Even if we own or license a relevant issued patent, we may not be able to preclude competitors from commercializing drugs that may compete directly with one or more of our products or product candidates, in which event such rights may not provide us with any meaningful competitive advantage. In the absence or upon successful challenge of patent protection, drugs may be subject to generic competition, which could adversely affect pricing and sales volumes of the affected products.

It is generally difficult to determine the relative strength or scope of a biotechnology or pharmaceutical patent position in absolute terms at any given time. The issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its validity or enforceability, which can be challenged in litigation or via administrative proceedings. The License Agreement from which we derive or license intellectual property provide for various royalty, milestone, sublicensing and other payments, and include other provisions like patent prosecution and enforcement, insurance, indemnification and other obligations and rights, and is subject to certain reservations of rights. While we generally have the right to defend and enforce patents licensed to or by us, either in the first instance or if the licensor or licensee chooses not to do so, we must usually bear the cost of doing so.

Patents have a limited life and expire by law.

In addition to uncertainties as to scope, validity, enforceability and changes in law, patents by law have limited lives. Upon expiration of patent protection, our drug candidates and/or products may be subject to generic competition, which could adversely affect pricing and sales volumes of the affected products.

We depend on intellectual property licensed from third parties and unpatented technology, trade secrets and confidential information. If we lose any of these rights, including by failing to achieve milestone requirements or to satisfy other conditions, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be harmed.

Our core product candidate is derived from intellectual property licensed from a third party. We could lose the right to patents and other intellectual property licensed to us if the related License Agreement is terminated due to a breach by us or otherwise. Our ability to commercialize products incorporating licensed intellectual property would be impaired if the related License Agreements were terminated. In addition, we are required to make substantial cash payments, achieve milestones and satisfy other conditions, including filing for and obtaining marketing approvals and introducing products, to maintain rights under our intellectual property license. Due to the nature of this agreement and the uncertainties of development, we may not be able to achieve milestones or satisfy conditions to which we have contractually committed, and as a result may be unable to maintain our rights under the license. If we do not comply with our License Agreement, the licensor may terminate it, which could result in our losing our rights to, and therefore being unable to commercialize, related products.

We also rely on unpatented technology, trade secrets and confidential information. Third parties may independently develop substantially equivalent information and techniques or otherwise gain access to our technology or disclose our technology, and we may be unable to effectively protect our rights in unpatented technology, trade secrets and confidential information. We require each of our employees, consultants and advisors to execute a confidentiality agreement at the commencement of an employment or consulting relationship with us. These agreements may, however, not provide effective protection in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of confidential information. Any loss of trade secret protection or other unpatented technology rights could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If we infringe third-party patent or other intellectual property rights, we may need to alter or terminate a product development program.

There may be patent or other intellectual property rights belonging to others that require us to alter our products, pay licensing fees or cease certain activities. If our products infringe patent or other intellectual property rights of others, the owners of those rights could bring legal actions against us claiming damages and seeking to enjoin manufacturing and marketing of the affected products. If these legal actions are successful, in addition to any potential liability for damages, we could be required to obtain a license in order to continue to manufacture or market the affected products. We may not prevail in any action brought against us, and any license required under any rights that we infringe may not be available on acceptable terms or at all.

Research, development and commercialization of a biopharmaceutical product often require choosing between alternative development and optimization routes at various stages in the development process. Preferred routes may depend on subsequent discoveries and test results and cannot be predicted with certainty at the outset. There are numerous third-party patents in our field, and we may need to obtain a license under a patent in order to pursue the preferred development route of one or more of our products or product candidates. The need to obtain a license would decrease the ultimate profitability of the applicable product. If we cannot negotiate a license, we might have to pursue a less desirable development route or terminate the program altogether.

We may be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents or the patents of our licensors, which could be expensive, time-consuming and unsuccessful.

Competitors may infringe our patents or the patents of our licensors. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to take legal action to enforce our patents or our licensors’ patents against such infringing activity. Such enforcement proceedings can be expensive and time-consuming. In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that one or more of our patents is invalid or is unenforceable, or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the compositions or activities in question. An adverse result could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated, held unenforceable, or interpreted narrowly and could put our patent applications at risk of not issuing. Defense against these assertions, non-infringement, invalidity or unenforceability regardless of their merit, would involve substantial litigation expense and would be a substantial diversion of employee resources from our business. In the event of a successful claim of infringement against us, we may have to pay substantial damages, including damages and attorneys’ fees for willful infringement, obtain one or more licenses from third parties, pay royalties or redesign our infringing products, which may be impossible or require substantial time and monetary expenditure.

Post-grant proceedings provoked by third parties or brought by the United States Patent and Trademarks Office may be brought to determine the validity or priority of inventions with respect to our patents or patent applications or those of our licensors. An unfavorable outcome could result in a loss of our current patent rights and could require us to cease using the related technology or to attempt to license rights to it from the prevailing party. Our business could be harmed if the prevailing party does not offer us a license on commercially reasonable terms. Litigation or post-grant proceedings may result in a decision adverse to our interests and, even if we are successful, may result in substantial costs and distract our management and other employees. We may not be able to prevent, alone or with our licensors, misappropriation of our trade secrets or confidential information, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect those rights as fully as those within the United States.

Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

Risks Related to our common stock

Liquidity risks associated with our common stock.

There is a limited trading market for our shares of common stock and while the Company’s common stock may be approved for listing on NASDAQ Capital Market, there can be no assurance that (1) an active trading market will be developed or sustained, (2) the liquidity of such market will increase, (3) our stockholders will be able sell their shares of common stock, or (4) the price that our stockholders may obtain for their common stock will be greater than the public offering price. If an active market for our common stock with meaningful trading volume does not develop or is not maintained, the market price of our common stock may decline materially and you may not be able to sell your shares. Our stock currently trades on OTCQB and our shares of common stock are thinly traded.

The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly, which could lead to losses for stockholders.

The securities of public companies can experience extreme price and volume fluctuations, which can be unrelated or out of proportion to the operating performance of such companies. We expect our common stock price will be subject to similar volatility. Any negative change in the public’s perception of the prospects of our Company or companies in our market could also depress our common stock price, regardless of our actual results. Factors affecting the trading price of our common stock may include:

The application of the “penny stock” rules could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and increase your transaction costs to sell those shares.

The open-market trading of our common stock is currently subject to the “penny stock” rules. The penny stock rules impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (generally those with assets in excess of $1 million or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 together with their spouses). For transactions covered by these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchase of securities and have received the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction before the purchase. Additionally, for any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the broker-dealer must deliver, before the transaction, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the Commission relating to the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must disclose the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally, monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information on the limited market in penny stocks. These additional burdens imposed on broker-dealers may restrict the ability or decrease the willingness of broker-dealers to sell our common stock, and may result in decreased liquidity of our common stock and increased transaction costs for sales and purchases of our common stock as compared to other securities. Therefore, as long as our shares of common stock are subject to the penny stock rules, the holders of such shares of common stock may find it more difficult to sell their securities.

We do not intend to pay dividends.

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since inception and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Earnings, if any, that we may realize will be retained in the business for further development and expansion.

Concentration of Stock Ownership and Control.

Our executive officers and directors currently control approximately 42% of the common stock of the Company, and Checkmate Capital and its affiliates, one of our former debt holders and lead investors in the Series B round, control approximately 14% of the common stock of the Company. The Company has employee options, incentive stock warrants, preferred stock and convertible notes that could result in further dilution. We may conduct funding rounds in the future, much of which may utilize our common stock. In this regard, management, prior investors and future investors may control a significantly large amount of equity, and as a result, these stockholders acting together will be able to influence many matters requiring stockholder approval including the election of directors and other significant corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change in control, and could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their shares of common stock as part of a sale of our company and may affect the market price of our stock.

The Company has Preferred Stock with additional priority rights.

The Company has two classes of preferred stock, which provide voting, approval, liquidation, conversion, and other rights that are senior to the common stock of the Company. The Company may also issue up to an additional 4,998,071 shares of blank-check preferred stock in the future. As a result, the preferred stockholders can exert significant influence over the Company and can dilute the financial interests of the common stockholders.

Series A preferred stockholders have rights to approve certain transactions, including additional debt, payment of dividends in certain scenarios, and other similar items, all voting together as a separate class. There are currently 480 Series A shares outstanding held by two institutional holders, convertible into approximately 4.2 million shares of common stock inclusive of accrued dividends. Series B preferred stock has liquidation preferences senior to the common stock; and all such shares and accrued dividends are convertible into shares of common stock. This will lead to dilution of your shares. On December 6, 2021, all holders of Series E-1 preferred stock agreed to exchange their preferred shares for 28,839,428 million shares of common stock, and Series E-1 preferred stock was retired prior to this offering.

As long as shares of preferred stock are outstanding, whether now or in the future, common stockholders may have reduced control over certain affairs of the Company, lower priority at the time of liquidation, and continued dilution of their voting and economic rights in the shares of common stock of the Company.

We will need to grow the size of our organization, and we may experience difficulties in managing this growth.

As of December 31, 2021, we had four full-time employees and one part-time employee. As our drug development and commercialization plans and strategies develop, we expect to need additional operational, sales, marketing, managerial, financial and other personnel, as well as additional resources to expand our operations.

We currently rely, and for the foreseeable future will continue to rely, in large part on certain third party organizations, advisors and consultants to provide certain services, including substantially all aspects of regulatory approval, clinical trial management and manufacturing. There can be no assurance that the services of independent organizations, advisors and consultants will continue to be available to us on a timely basis when needed, or that we can find qualified replacements. In addition, if we are unable to manage our outsourced activities effectively or if the quality or accuracy of the services provided by consultants is compromised for any reason, our clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated, and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval of our product candidates or otherwise advance our business. There can be no assurance that we will be able to manage our existing consultants or find other competent outside contractors and consultants on economically reasonable terms, or at all. If we are not able to effectively expand our organization by hiring new employees and expanding our groups of consultants and contractors, or we are not able to effectively build out new facilities to accommodate this expansion, we may not be able to successfully implement our business plan to further develop and commercialize our product candidates and, accordingly, may not achieve our research, development and commercialization goals.

We are a smaller reporting company, and we cannot be certain if the reduced reporting requirements applicable to smaller reporting companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined in the Exchange Act, and we will remain a smaller reporting company until the fiscal year following the determination that our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is more than $250 million measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter, or our annual revenue is more than $100 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and our voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is more than $700 million measured on the last business day of our second fiscal quarter. Smaller reporting companies are able to provide simplified executive compensation disclosure and have certain other reduced disclosure obligations, including, among other things, being required to provide only two years of audited financial statements and not being required to provide selected financial data, supplemental financial information or risk factors.

We may choose to take advantage of the available exemptions for smaller reporting companies. We cannot predict whether investors will find our common stock less attractive if we rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our shares price may be more volatile.

If we fail to comply with the rules and regulations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our operating results, our ability to operate our business and investors’ views of us may be harmed.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires public companies to conduct an annual review and evaluation of their internal controls. Ensuring that we have adequate internal financial and accounting controls and procedures in place so that we can produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis is a costly and time-consuming effort that will need to be evaluated frequently. Our failure to maintain the effectiveness of our internal controls in accordance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material adverse effect on our business. We could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which could have an adverse effect on the price of our common stock. In addition, our efforts to comply with the rules and regulations under the Sarbanes-Oxley or new or changed laws, regulations, and standards may differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to practice. Regulatory authorities may investigate transactions disclosed in our “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and if legal proceedings are initiated against us, it may harm our business.

We have identified certain material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and if our remediation of such material weaknesses is not effective, or if we fail to develop and maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable laws and regulations could be impaired.

In the course of preparing our financial statements, we have historically identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses related to limited accounting personnel and resources resulting into lack of segregation of duties, lack of experience in accounting for equity transactions, and lack of internal controls. We have concluded that these material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting occurred because during 2020 and much of 2021, we did not have a chief financial officer and our principal accounting officer did not had the necessary business processes, systems, personnel and related internal controls necessary to satisfy the accounting and financial reporting requirements of a public company.

On December 1, 2021, we recruited an interim chief financial officer who has significant experience in public company accounting, and we believe that his expertise and oversight over preparation of financial statements and an understanding of SEC’s rules and regulations will allow for better segregation of duties in our financial reporting processes and improve our procedure for disclosure controls. This interim CFO has agreed to join the Company on a full-time basis upon the completion of the next round of funding.

We believe we have taken necessary actions to substantially address each of the material weaknesses discussed above and as disclosed in prior financial reports, and our auditor found no material weaknesses in internal controls in connection with the preparation of this annual report. We plan to take additional steps to continue to improve our accounting function; and we must be able to confirm that such remedial measures have been operating effectively for a sufficient period of time. Further, we cannot assure you that any such actions we have or will take will prevent or avoid potential future material weaknesses. Our current controls and any new controls that we develop may become inadequate because of changes in conditions in our business. Further, weaknesses in our disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting may be discovered in the future. Any failure to develop or maintain effective controls or any difficulties encountered in their implementation or improvement could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and may result in a restatement of our financial statements for prior periods.

Our independent registered public accounting firm is not required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting until after we become an “accelerated” or “large accelerated” filer as those terms are defined in the Exchange Act. At such time, our independent registered public accounting firm may issue a report that is adverse in the event it is not satisfied with the level at which our internal control over financial reporting is documented, designed or operating. Any failure to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting also could adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations and annual independent registered public accounting firm attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting that we will eventually be required to include in our periodic reports that are filed with the SEC. Ineffective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial and other information, which would likely have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.

Our financial statements may be materially affected if our estimates prove to be inaccurate as a result of our limited experience in making critical accounting estimates.

Financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP require the use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. These estimates, judgments, and assumptions are inherently uncertain, and, if they prove to be wrong, then we face the risk that charges to income will be required. In addition, because we have limited to no operating history and limited experience in making these estimates, judgments, and assumptions, the risk of future charges to income may be greater than if we had more experience in these areas. Any such charges could significantly harm our business, financial condition, results of operations, and the price of our securities. See “Note 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” under notes to our consolidated financial statements. For a discussion of the accounting estimates, judgments, and assumptions that we believe are the most critical to an understanding of our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None. Not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company currently conducts its business from offices in Austin, Texas and Palm Beach, Florida. The Company’s office space in Austin is leased month-to-month at a rate of $216 per month. The Company has no formal agreement for its Florida office space which is leased by Greenblock Capital, a company for which our General Counsel is affiliated.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not a party to any pending legal proceeding and, to the knowledge of our management, no federal, state or local governmental agency is presently contemplating any proceeding against us. No director, executive officer, affiliate of ours, or owner of record or beneficially of more than five percent of our common stock is a party adverse to the Company or has a material interest adverse to us in any proceeding.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None; not applicable.

part II

ITEM 5: MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

There is a limited “established trading market” for our shares of common stock. No assurance can be given that a robust market for our common stock will develop or be maintained. If a robust public market ever develops in the future, the sale of shares of our common stock that are deemed to be “restricted securities” pursuant to Rule 144 of the SEC by members of management or others may have a substantial adverse impact on any such market.

Set forth below are the high and low closing bid prices for our common stock for each quarter of the years 2020 and 2021. These bid prices were obtained from OTC Markets Group, Inc. All prices listed herein reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commissions and may not represent actual transactions.

Holders

The number of record holders of our common stock as of the date of this Annual Report is 315. This figure does not include beneficial owners who may hold their shares in “street name”.

Dividends

We have not declared any cash dividends with respect to our common stock, and do not intend to declare dividends in the foreseeable future. Our future dividend policy cannot be ascertained with any certainty, and if and until we determine to engage in any business or we complete any acquisition, reorganization or merger, no such policy will be formulated. There are material restrictions limiting our ability to pay dividends on our securities, including state law and provisions under our Class A Preferred Stock and various debt instruments.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

The following table sets forth the sales of unregistered securities by the Company in 2021:

We issued all securities reported to persons who were “accredited investors” as that term is defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D of the SEC, or to “sophisticated investors” or key employees; and each such person had prior access to all material information about us prior to the offer and sale of these securities, and had the right to consult legal and accounting professionals. We believe that the offer and sale of these securities were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, pursuant to Sections 4(a)(2) and Rule 506 of Regulation D of the SEC.

Purchases of Equity Securities by Us and Affiliated Purchasers

None.

ITEM 6: SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 7: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

A. Plan of Operation

Overview

The Company’s business is the development of next-generation nuclear medicines for the treatment of cancer and related diseases. Our initial technology is Samarium-153 DOTMP, a/k/a CycloSam^® (“CycloSam^®” or the “New Technology”), a clinical-stage bone targeting radiopharmaceutical. The FDA cleared our IND in August 2021 to commence clinical trials of CycloSam^® on patients with metastatic bone cancer, an open-label, dose escalating trial that may result in sufficient data to move subsequently into a pivotal trial.

On April 20, 2020, we executed a Patent and Technology License Agreement and Trademark Assignment (the “License Agreement”) with IGL Pharma Inc. (“IGL”), through a newly created, wholly-owned subsidiary called QSAM Therapeutics Inc. (“QSAM Therapeutics”), which License Agreement was mutually amended on November 24, 2021. The License Agreement provides QSAM Therapeutics with exclusive, worldwide and sub-licensable rights to all of IGL’s patents, product data and knowhow with respect to CycloSam^®. The License Agreement also transfers to QSAM Therapeutics the rights to the product name CycloSam^® for the technology, and provides QSAM Therapeutics a first right of refusal to license other technologies from IGL in the future.

On November 6, 2020, the Company entered into an Omnibus Separation Agreement (the “Separation Agreement”) with its unconsolidated investee, Earth Property Holdings LLC (“EPH”). Our board of directors approved the Separation Agreement in furtherance of its previously disclosed plan to secure new technologies and business opportunities in the broader biosciences sector, and to significantly reduce debt and liabilities of the Company and eliminate under-performing assets and agreements.

The Separation Agreement marked a discontinuance of the Company’s soil health operations (the “Legacy Business”) to focus solely on the development of its exclusively licensed radiopharmaceutical drug candidate, CycloSam^®, as well as other drug candidates that it may license or otherwise secure in the future. Revenue and expenses from the Legacy Business are presented on our consolidated financial statements as “Discontinued Operations.”

New Equity and Debt Financings; S-1 Registration

To advance the development of the New Technology, in November 2020 we commenced a $2.5 million Series B Preferred stock offering (the “Series B Offering”). We completed the Series B Offering in January 2021, raising $2.5 million inclusive of $156,000 in debt conversion, and issuing a total of 2,500 shares of Series B Preferred Stock.

In connection with this Series B Offering closing, our Board approved a modification to the offering terms in January 2021, and we issued in that month a total of 6.27 million common stock warrants. These warrants were originally exercisable prior to July 8, 2021 at an exercise price of $0.35 per share, and later modified by our Board to expire on October 15, 2021 and be exercisable at $0.25 per share. As of October 15, 2021, seven holders of the Series B warrants exercised those warrants and received a total of 1,871,431 common shares for total consideration to the Company of $467,858. Also in 2021, our lead investor in the Series B Offering earned a warrant for 475,000 shares exercisable at $0.45 per share, which warrant was to expire January 15, 2022, but modified in 2022 to expire January 15, 2023.

In the fourth quarter of 2021, we entered into convertible note purchase agreements with eight accredited investors, pursuant to which we issued an aggregate of $605,000 of convertible notes (the “Notes”). The Notes mature on December 31, 2023 and are convertible into shares of common stock of the Company in the event of future equity financing of $5 million or greater, NASDAQ uplisting, or at the discretion of the noteholders, at a conversion price of $0.20 per share. The obligations under the Notes are unsecured. The Company has agreed to pay simple interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the outstanding amount of the Notes until fully repaid or converted. In connection with the Notes offering, the Company issued 1,008,334 warrants to the noteholders, with each warrant convertible into one share of common stock at an exercise price of $0.60 per share beginning from the date of the warrant until October 31, 2022. The outstanding balance of the Notes as of December 31, 2021 was $605,000, exclusive of accrued interest.

In December 2021, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-1 with the SEC to raise up to $20 million through a common stock offering underwritten by Think Equity LLC, an investment bank based in New York. Concurrently, the Company submitted an application with the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC to list its common shares on that national exchange. While management believes these transactions could be completed in the first quarter of 2022, there is no guarantee that the Company will be able to complete the equity offering or have its shares listed on NASDAQ.

The process of developing pharmaceutical products is extremely costly, especially as such programs enter clinical trials, as our radiopharmaceutical candidate has. The Company will need to raise additional capital to continue these activities in 2022 and beyond. As of the end of 2021, the Company had approximately $1.5 million in cash. Such funds are sufficient to cover the Company’s current operational burn through 2022; however, given the additional costs of conducting our clinical trials, such funds will likely be extinguished in the first two quarters of 2022. It is critical, therefore, for the Company to complete is currently anticipated registered, underwritten equity offering to maintain our clinical trials, or otherwise raise additional capital through equity or debt offerings. There is no guarantee that the Company will be successful in these efforts.

B. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

COVID-19

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic and recommended containment and mitigation measures worldwide. Although our operations were not materially affected by the Covid outbreak, in the recent months, Covid has had direct impact on the commencement of our clinical trials. Due to Covid infections at one of our vendor labs, team members leading certain startup activities for our project were sent home and work could only be initiated upon their return, causing us to delay a key procedure, which was ultimately completed. General conditions around Covid have also created supply chain delays with certain of our manufacturers and distributors. Lastly, there remains a risk with the rise of Covid cases in the US could delay enrollment of patients into our clinical trials, interrupt treatment, or cause a patient to withdraw due to prolonged effects of infection. To mitigate these risks, we have worked with our vendors and suppliers to designate and train additional staff to support our project, and we have ordered sufficient supplies to support our entire Phase I trial. We are also securing secondary suppliers to ensure supply chain resilience. Additionally, we are working with our clinical trial site to screen more patients in order to have a sufficient volume of qualified patients waiting to enroll.

Results of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we recorded no revenue from continuing operations. Revenue from a management agreement with EPH and other Legacy Business operations have been reclassified in our Statement of Operations on our Consolidated Financial Statements as “discontinued operations.”

For the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded a net loss from continuing operations of $11,977,065, an increase of $6,157,128 (105.8%) from our net loss from continuing operations of $5,819,937 for the same period in 2020. Basic and diluted net loss per share was $0.43 and $0.89 for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The primary reasons for the increase in the net loss for 2021 over 2020 were an increase of $7,917,761 in compensation and related expenses (mainly non-cash items as discussed below), as well as an increase in professional fees of $1,542,985; offset slightly by a decrease of $28,724 in general and administrative expenses.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

For year ended December 31, 2021, cash increased by $1,491,562 from $8,304 as of December 31, 2020 to $1,499,866 at the end of 2021. This increase was primarily the result of cash provided by financing activities of $3,260,364, offset by cash used in operating activities of $1,768,803.

Net cash used by operating activities was $1,768,803 for the year ended December 31, 2021, which reflected our net loss during the period of $11,977,065, non-cash adjustments of $10,034,326, a net increase in operating liabilities of $331,055, and a net increase in operating assets of $157,118. The majority of non-cash adjustments consists of a $7,826,779 stock-based compensation for the issuance of Series E-1 shares and the subsequent exchange of the Series E-1 shares into common stock, $744,505 on the loss on conversion of bridge notes and accrued interest into common stock, and $390,069 on the loss on conversion of debentures into common stock. Our net loss resulted largely from these non-cash items. Net cash used in investing activities during year ended December 31, 2021 consisted of $0.

At December 31, 2021, our cash totaled $1,499,866. Our cash is currently held at large U.S. banks.

Based on our current strategy and operating plan, at the end of 2020 we needed to raise additional capital to support operations through the coming year. This was accomplished during 2021; however, at the end of 2021 there was still substantial doubt about our ability to operate as a going concern. See “Note 2 – Basis of Presentation and Going Concern” in our consolidated financial statements.

As the Company enters its clinical trials, management expects expenses to increase materially. These expenses include dosing and monitoring of patients who participate in our clinical trials, manufacturing expenses, payment of fees to our CRO and other service providers, and other general overhead expenses including additional public company costs. We anticipate that we will be able to proceed with these plans if we are successful in raising additional funds through our planned underwritten equity offering. There is no guarantee, however, that we can complete this offering on terms suitable to the Company and its shareholders if at all.

Series B Financing. In January 2021, the Company closed a Series B Convertible Preferred Stock private placement (the “Series B Offering”) and issued a total of 2,500 shares at a price of $1,000 per share, raising an aggregate amount of $2.5 million, inclusive of $156,000 in debt conversion. The Series B Offering, which commenced in 2020, was led by Checkmate Capital Group, LLC, a California based investment firm focused on biotechnology and other technology investments. The Company completed the offering primarily to advance its new business of drug development including funding the Company’s upcoming clinical trials for its drug candidate CycloSam, as well as for general working capital and overhead.

Warrant Conversion. In connection with this Series B Offering closing, we issued in 2021 a total of 6.27 million common stock warrants, which were originally exercisable prior to July 8, 2021 at an exercise price of $0.35 per share, and later modified by our Board to expire on October 15, 2021 and be exercisable at $0.25 per share. As of October 15, 2021, seven holders of the Series B warrants exercised those warrants and received a total of 1,871,431 common shares for total consideration to the Company of $467,858.

Convertible Note Financing. In the fourth quarter of 2021, we entered into convertible note purchase agreements with eight accredited investors, pursuant to which we issued an aggregate of $605,000 of convertible notes (the “Notes”). The Notes mature on December 31, 2023 and are convertible into shares of common stock of the Company in the event of future equity financing of $5 million or greater, NASDAQ uplisting, or at the discretion of the noteholders, at a conversion price of $0.20 per share. The obligations under the Notes are unsecured. The Company has agreed to pay simple interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the outstanding amount of the Notes until fully repaid or converted. In connection with the Notes offering, the Company issued 1,008,334 warrants to the noteholders, with each warrant convertible into one share of common stock at an exercise price of $0.60 per share beginning from the date of the warrant until October 31, 2022. The outstanding balance of the Notes as of December 31, 2021 was $605,000, exclusive of accrued interest.

Prior Bridge Note Financing. The Company issued a total of $2,851,908 in Convertible Promissory Notes (the “Bridge Notes”) during 2017, 2018 and 2019. Proceeds from the Bridge Notes were used to for the Company’s Legacy Business. As of December 31, 2020, a total of $1,965,030 plus $964,525 in accrued interest on the Bridge Notes were converted into approximately 13.3 million shares of common stock. As of March 31, 2021, the remaining $1,447,312 of principal and interest was converted into 6,578,702 shares of common stock, and no Bridge Notes currently remain outstanding.

Prior Series A Preferred Stock Financing. The Company raised $600,000 in our Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) from two separate accredited investors in November 2015 and January 2016, respectively. The Series A Preferred Stock bears a 6% dividend per annum, calculable and payable per quarter in cash or additional shares of common stock as determined in the Certificate of Designation. The Series A Preferred Stock was originally convertible at $6.50 per share at the discretion of the holders and contains price protection provisions in the instance that we issue shares at a lower price, subject to certain exemptions. The price has been reset several times since the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock. Most currently, as a result of the closing of the Series B preferred stock offering in January 2021, the conversion price was reset to $0.16 per share. Series A Preferred Stock holders also received other rights and protections including piggy-back registration rights, rights of first refusal to invest in subsequent offerings, security over our assets (secondary to our debt holders), and certain negative covenant guaranties that we will not incur non-ordinary debt, enter into variable pricing security sales, redeem or repurchase stock or make distributions, and other similar warranties. The Series A Preferred Stock was redeemable on July 1, 2019 per a March 2019 modification and is currently in technical default. The Series A Preferred Stock has no voting rights until converted to common stock. The Series A Preferred Stockholders also received warrants in connection with their investment, all of which had expired in January 2021.

All promissory notes and shares in these offerings were sold pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Exchange Commission under Regulation D to accredited or sophisticated investors who completed questionnaires confirming their status. Unless otherwise described in this Quarterly Report, reference to “restricted” common stock means that the shares have not been registered and are restricted from resale pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Cash and Working Capital

We have incurred negative cash flows from operations since inception. As of December 31, 2021, we had an accumulated deficit of $29,281,674 and working capital of $276,916.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Disclosures regarding our Critical Accounting Policies are provided in Note 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the footnotes to our consolidated financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company did not engage in any “off-balance sheet arrangements” (as that term is defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K) as of December 31, 2021.

ITEM 7A: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 8: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The financial statements and the reports of our independent registered accounting firm required pursuant to this item are included in Item 15 of this report and are presented beginning on page F-1.

ITEM 9: CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

In connection with the preparation of this Annual Report, management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer, General Counsel and the Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Management concluded that, as of December 31, 2021, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedure were effective based on the criteria in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the COSO, version 2013.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s management used the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) to perform this evaluation. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2021. The Company’s management determined that previously identified material weaknesses (as described below) had been remediated as of December 31, 2021.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

During 2020, the Company did not have a full time CFO or adequate accounting function personnel to support the operations of the Company. As a result, management noted:

During 2021, the Company engaged a consulting firm to assist with the back-office accounting, evaluation of internal controls, and updating of documentation. Additionally, the Company hired a part time CFO with extensive public accounting background to support the business and apply knowledge and expertise to the daily operations of the Company. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had implemented an effective segregation of duties in the accounting and financial reporting function by the use of the consulting firm and part time CFO. Additionally, the consulting firm and part time CFO reduces the risk of a material misstatement due to the experience of the firm and its associates working on the Company. Finally, with the addition of the part time CFO, the Company now has the knowledge and expertise for technical accounting matters including stock-based compensation arrangements. This part time CFO has agreed to assume a full time CFO position upon the completion of the Company’s listing on NASDAQ. If such event occurs, the Company believes it will further strengthen its accounting, financial reporting and internal controls.

While the Company is still in the process of documenting risks and controls related to the Company and its operations, the addition of the CFO will allow management to be more diligent in its efforts to continue to improve the reporting processes of the Company, including the addition of accounting resources and the continued development of proper accounting policies and procedures.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. We were not required to have, nor have we, engaged our independent registered public accounting firm to perform an audit of internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Except for controls implemented to address the deficiencies described above, there have been no other changes in our internal control over financial reporting in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during 2021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B: OTHER INFORMATION

There was no other information required to be disclosed in the fourth quarter of 2021 that was not filed by the Company in a Current Report on Form 8-K.

PART III

ITEM 10: DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Identification of Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the names of all of our current directors and executive officers. The Directors will serve until the next annual meeting of the shareholders or until their successors are elected or appointed and qualified, or their prior resignation or termination.

Business Experience

C. Richard Piazza, Ph.D. – Executive Chairman. Mr. Piazza was appointed as a member and the Executive Chairman of the board of the Company in November 2020. Mr. Piazza has also served since 2017 as President and CEO of IGL Pharma Inc., the licensor of CycloSam®, and a consultant to IsoTherapeutics Group, LLC, the inventors of the technology. Mr. Piazza also currently serves on the board of directors of NovaScan LLC, a privately-held cancer detection and diagnostics company. Prior to his work with IGL Pharma, from 2014 to 2016, he was CEO of SynVivo, Inc., a cancer diagnostics company. Mr. Piazza has more than 48 years of healthcare experience in both medical devices and pharmaceutical/biotech and has led several technology companies to market success including numerous FDA approvals in both sectors. Previously, he served in general management positions in both public and private international companies including Ohmeda, Smith & Nephew Pharmaceuticals, Marquest and VitaGen (world’s first bioartifical liver). Over his career, he has provided advisory services to some of world’s leading institutions including MD Anderson Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, University of California San Diego, University of Chicago and Kings College Hospital (London). In 2019, he co-founded QSAM Therapeutics, Inc. with Douglas Baum, our CEO. Mr. Piazza obtained a BS in Economics and a BS in Speech Pathology from the State University of New York and MA & PhD in Economics from the University of Buffalo and Leeds University.

We believe Mr. Piazza is qualified to serve on our board of directors due to his significant experience in the pharmaceutical and biotech industry, and his experience serving of the boards and in senior management positions in several publicly traded companies.

Douglas R. Baum – Chief Executive Officer & Director. Mr. Baum was appointed to the board of the Company in January 2020 and to the position of CEO in November 2020. He brings to the Company over 30 years of experience in the bioscience and biotech industries, including development, FDA/EMA approval and commercialization of multiple drugs and medical devices. Over his long senior executive tenure, he has overseen 15 product approvals through the FDA and EMA and raised over $85 million in capital to fund breakthrough technologies. Between 2017 and 2020, Mr. Baum consulted with multiple medical schools, biotech and pharmaceutical companies; and between 2012 and 2017, he served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Xeris Pharmaceuticals Inc. (currently, NASDAQ: XERS). Previously, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Macuclear Inc., and other executive level positions with clinical trial research firms including SCIREX and Premier Research Group, Inc. He holds a Master’s of Science in Technology Commercialization and BBA in International Business and Marketing from the University of Texas.

Mr. Baum’s extensive experience in the biotech industry as a senior level executive and vast exposure to the lifecycle of healthcare products from trials to commercialization makes him qualified to serve on our board of directors.

Christopher Nelson – General Counsel & Director. Mr. Nelson has been General Counsel and director of the Company since 2015, and was also its President from 2016 to November 2020. In these roles, he has overseen corporate and governance legal matters, finance and business development for the Company. He has also served since 2016 as Managing Director of GreenBlock Capital LLC in Palm Beach, Florida, a boutique mergers and acquisitions advisory firm specializing in bio-technology, ag-technology and similar sector business combination transactions; and since 2019 as General Counsel for Earth Property Holdings, LLC, a private equity-backed company engaged in soil health and compost manufacturing in Texas and Florida. Mr. Nelson has practiced law in Florida for over 26 years, and during that time has represented many start-up, early stage and established businesses seeking financing, acquisitions and general growth management counseling. Early in his career, Mr. Nelson was an associate with Greenberg Traurig PA, and with Akerman Senterfitt PA, both in Miami, Florida. At both firms he served in their corporate and securities practice, representing NYSE and NASDAQ companies. Mr. Nelson received a BA from Princeton University, and JD from University of Miami School of Law, and is a member of the Florida Bar.

Mr. Nelson’s extensive experience representing public companies in capital markets finance, mergers and acquisitions, and general corporate and governance matters, makes him qualified to serve on our board of directors.

Adam King, CPA – Interim Chief Financial Officer. Mr. King currently serves as Interim CFO for the Company, a position he has held since December 6, 2021. Mr. King is the founder and CEO of King Consulting Group, where he provides a range of financial and reporting services for clients that include Vice President of Finance for large private equity-backed international companies to CFO of small start-ups. Before founding King Consulting Group in January 2021, Mr. King was the CFO for Netsertive, a venture-backed digital marketing company in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. From 2016 to 2018, he was the Office Managing Audit Director for BDO’s Greenville, SC office, in addition to Audit Director in Raleigh, NC, and Boston. While at BDO, Mr. King worked with various clients, from Tech and Life Science start-ups to large billion-dollar publicly traded companies. Before his time at BDO, he served as the Director of Revenue Assurance and Internal Controls at Bandwidth.com and an Audit Manager at Ernst & Young. Mr. King holds a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Elon University and is a CPA in Raleigh, NC. In October 2019, Mr. King and his wife filed for personal bankruptcy under chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code due to excessive medical expenses incurred by the family in connection with their child’s medical diagnosis and treatment. The final payment under their bankruptcy plan is scheduled to end in September 2024.

Joel Mayersohn – Director. Mr. Mayersohn has been a director of the Company since 2015. Mr. Mayersohn is a Partner in the Ft. Lauderdale, FL office of Dickinson Wright PLLC since 2016, where he specializes in corporate, securities and business law. Over the last 30 years, he has advised a diversified client base in private placements, public offerings, mergers and acquisitions, financing transactions and general securities law matters. He also has experience in venture capital, bridge loans and pipe financings. He is a member of the Florida and New York Bars. Mr. Mayersohn received a Bachelor of Arts and Juris Doctorate from State University of New York at Buffalo.

Mr. Mayersohn’s almost 40 years of experience of advising public and private companies in all areas of corporate and securities law, including representing technology and healthcare companies make him qualified to serve on our board of directors.

Charles J. Link, Jr. – Director. Dr. Link was appointed to the Board in February 2021, and brings decades of biotech and drug development experience to the Company. He currently serves on the executive committee of the Board of Directors at NovaScan Inc., a clinical-stage company focused on cancer detection. Dr. Link also serves on the Board of Directors for Viewpoint Molecular Targeting, a clinical stage company developing alpha-particle radiopharmaceuticals; and is the founder and Executive Director of biotech startup Syncromune. He is also a founder of biotech startup ChainLink Pharma. Previously, Dr. Link was the CEO, CSO, Chairman, and founder of NewLink Genetics, a NASDAQ-listed immunotherapy company focused on developing novel immuno-oncology product candidates, from 1999 until his retirement in 2019. During his tenure at NewLink, Dr. Link led a series of collaborative transactions totaling hundreds of millions of dollars with Merck, Roche and the United States government. He also oversaw the collaboration with Merck to develop EVERBO, the first Ebola vaccine to receive FDA approval. Prior to founding NewLink Genetics, Dr. Link was an attending physician at the National Cancer Institute. He has authored more than 100 peer-reviewed papers. Dr. Link received an M.D. from Stanford University, and he attended the U.S. Air Force Academy.

Dr. Link’s experience as CEO and Chairman of a NASDAQ-listed biotechnology company where he led several multi-party drug development programs and successfully raised significant funding in the capital markets, as well as his service as an oncology physician and senior government researcher, qualifies him to serve on our board of directors.

Adriann Sax – Director. Ms. Sax was appointed Director in January 2022. She has a distinguished 30+ year career in biotech and life sciences, serving in leadership, operational and business development roles with a focus on oncology for both Fortune 100 and start-up companies. Since May 2020, she has served as CEO and co-founder of Vetigenics LLC, an animal health biotech company, where she has secured partnerships with Merck, obtained federal grants, and was named 2021 Start-up of the Year by the Penn Center for Innovation at the University of Pennsylvania. From 2019 to 2020, she served as CEO and Director of Orsenix LLC, a clinical staged oncology biotech, and from 2014 through 2019, as Entrepreneur in Residence at Fortress Biotech. Previously she was EVP and Chief Commercial Officer at Kadmon Corp., a division of Sanofi Company, and before that served in various leadership capacities at large pharmaceutical companies, notably Vice President at Bristol Myers Squibb, Executive Director at Merck & Co., and Executive Vice President in charge of Business Development and Strategic Planning at King Pharmaceuticals, leading to its $6.5 Billion acquisition by Pfizer. Ms. Sax holds an MBA from the Keller Graduate School and a BS in Animal Science from the University of Delaware. She is an active advisor and board member for many industry associations, academic institutions, and nonpublic company boards.

Ms. Sax’s extensive experience in biotech and life sciences, serving in leadership, operational, business development, and board of director roles for both Fortune 100 and start-up companies qualifies him to serve on our board of directors.

Other Key Employees and Advisors

Namrata Chand – VP Operations. Age 41. Ms. Chand has held the position of VP - Operations with the Company since November 2020. Ms. Chand brings 20 years of experience and a diverse foundation in administration, marketing, operations and business development within non-profit and for-profit sectors. Initially focusing her career in large organizations, she held leadership positions in marketing and corporate relations at Nestle, Beam Suntory, Aetna and BFAS, a leading national animal welfare organization, to build brand awareness, improve operational efficiency and drive overall growth. Ms. Chand later entered the life science space and joined La Jolla Capital Partners in 2011 where she assisted small to midsize healthcare companies through various stages of development with special emphasis on capital formation, operations, supply chain, clinical trials, marketing and business development. Most recently, Ms. Chand led Investor Relations and Business Development for Ryca International, an innovative dental product company that entered into a joint venture with a leading global medtech company. In addition to leading operations at the Company, Ms. Chand serves on the Advisory Board of a number of early-stage biotech companies.

Barry Sugarman – Scientific Advisor. Age 63. Mr. Sugarman has held the position of senior regulatory and scientific advisor with the Company since November 2020. Mr. Sugarman has over 30 years of experience spanning public and private companies in the pharmaceutical, medical device, dietary supplement and cosmetic industries. Mr. Sugarman has considerable direct experience in pharmaceutical product development, manufacturing, clinical trials, regulatory affairs, FDA and government relations, marketing, and distribution; as well as Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP’s), Good Clinical Practices (GCP’s), Good Laboratory Practices (GLP’s), and International Conference for Harmonization (ICH) requirements. He is an author and co-author of numerous FDA filings and approvals including Investigational New Drug Applications, New Drug Applications, Abbreviated New Drug Applications, and Medical Device Applications 510(k)’s. Mr. Sugarman is a member of the Regulatory Affairs Professional Society, American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, Association of Clinical Research Professionals, and the National Association of Corporate Directors. He is a co-author of “Prompt, Accurate Diagnosis of Pediatric Cancer and Leukemia for Pediatricians, Orthopedists, and Family Practitioners” (2007).

Richard “Keith” Frank – Scientific Advisor. Age 65. Dr. Frank has served as scientific advisor to the Company since April 2020. Since 2006, he has served as CEO, President and co-founder of IsoTherapeutics LLC, a radiopharmaceutical R&D and contract manufacturing company that invented CycloSam^® and provides services for both large and small biotechnology companies. He also serves as Chairman of IGL Pharma, Inc., the Company’s licensor of CycloSam^®. Prior to these positions, Dr. Frank spent over 20 years in numerous senior scientific positions at Dow Chemical Company. At Dow, he was a collaborator in the development of bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals Quadramet (Sm-153-EDTMP) and STR (Ho-166-DOTMP). Additionally, Dr. Frank was the lead inventor of Iotrex™ for use in the GliaSite® Radiation Therapy System. He also initiated and was the technical leader of Dow’s ChelaMed^SM Radiopharmaceutical Services offering.

Jaime “Jim” Simon – Scientific Advisor. Age 68. Dr. Simon has served as scientific advisor to the Company since April 2020. Since 2006, he has served as Vice President and Chief Science Officer, and co-founder of IsoTherapeutics LLC, a radiopharmaceutical R&D and contract manufacturing company that invented CycloSam^® and provides services for both large and small biotechnology companies. Prior to co-founding IsoTherapeutics, Dr. Simon spent over 25 years as a senior scientist at Dow Chemical Company where his initial proposals led to the creation of Dow’s radiopharmaceutical group. At Dow, Dr. Simon was the lead inventor for all bone agent patents including Sm-153-EDTMP and Ho-166-DOTMP. Dr. Simon has been involved in numerous FDA submissions for clinical trials, and has coordinated the radioisotope activities at the University of Missouri Research Reactor (isotope production), the University of Missouri Veterinary School (dog studies), and The Harry S. Truman Veterans Administration Hospital (human clinical studies).

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any of the Company’s directors or executive officers or any person nominated or chosen by the Company to become a director or executive officer.

Directorships

None of our directors is a director of a company or has been in the last five years the director of any other reporting company or registered investment company.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

Except as disclosed under Mr. King’s biographical information pertaining to Mr. King’s and his wife’s filing of personal bankruptcy under the United States Bankruptcy Code in 2019, during the past 10 years, none of our present or former directors, executive officers or persons nominated to become directors or executive officers or control person of our Company:

Acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity;

Engaging in any type of business practice; or

Engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws;

any Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation; or

any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or

any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud in connection with any business activity; or

Promoters and Control Person

To the best of our management’s knowledge, no person who may be deemed to have been a promoter or founder of our Company was the subject of any of the legal proceedings listed under the heading “Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings” above.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Our shares of common stock are registered under the Exchange Act, and therefore the officers, directors and holders of more than 10% of our outstanding shares are subject to the provisions of Section 16(a), which requires them to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and our other equity securities. Officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely upon review of the copies of such forms furnished to us during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, we have determined that the following officers and directors failed to timely file reports under Section 16. All directors and officers have filed Form 5s as of February 15, 2022 reporting all missed transactions.

All transactions were timely disclosed by the Company on Forms 8-K with respect to officer/director appointments, and issuances of preferred shares and exchange of those shares into common stock; and also with respect to option grants, which were disclosed by the Company in quarterly or annual reports filed for the period when such transactions occurred.

Code of Ethics

On January 13, 2022, we adopted a revised code of ethics for our principal executive and financial officers, directors and employees. Our code of ethics, as amended, was posted to our web site on January 13, 2022, updating a prior version that was originally posted as of November 2015. On January 13, 2022, we also adopted a Policy on Insider Trading.

Corporate Governance

Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee is currently comprised of its Chairman, Joel Mayersohn, and Adriann Sax. We have determined that Mr. Mayersohn is not independent under Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act; however, pursuant to OTCQB rules, the Company is not currently required to have an audit committee. Ms. Sax qualifies as an independent director with financial experience to serve on the Audit Committee. We are in the process of appointing one additional independent director who will be qualified as a “financial expert” as required under NASDAQ rules to serve as the Audit Committee Chair, and intend on appointing a third independent director to the Audit Committee. The Company may not be approved for NASDAQ listing and may not appoint additional directors if the NASDAQ listing is not approved. Upon such new appointment if required, Mr. Mayersohn has agreed to resign from the Audit Committee.

On January 13, 2022, our Board adopted a new formal charter for the Audit Committee pursuant to NASDAQ rules. Under this new charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for assisting with the Board’s oversight of: (1) the quality and integrity of the Company’s financial statements and related disclosure; (2) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements relating to financial and accounting matters; (3) the independent auditor’s qualifications, performance and independence; (4) the integrity of the internal controls at the Company; and (5) the administration of the Company’s conflicts of interest and related party transactions policies and procedures. The Committee is also responsible for providing an avenue for effective communication among the Audit Committee, the independent auditor, management and the Board.

Under the new charter, the Audit Committee shall be comprised of three or more directors as determined by the Board, each of whom shall be an “independent director” for purposes of Audit Committee membership in accordance with the rules of NASDAQ or any successor national securities exchange on which the Company’s stock is listed, and meet the criteria for independence set forth in Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) (subject to the exemptions provided in Rule 10A-3(c) under the Exchange Act), and any other applicable laws, rules and regulations. No member of the Audit Committee shall have participated in the preparation of the financial statements of the Company or any subsidiary during the prior three-year period. Each member of the Audit Committee shall be free from any relationship (including disallowed compensatory arrangements) that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment as a member of the Audit Committee. Each member of the Audit Committee shall be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement, and have a working familiarity with basic finance and accounting practices, and at least one member of the Audit Committee shall be a “financial expert” in compliance with the criteria established by the SEC.

Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee is currently comprised of Douglas Baum, Joel Mayersohn, and Charles J. Link Jr., of whom only Dr. Link is an independent director under the board independence standards set forth by NASDAQ. The Compensation Committee formally instituted its governance procedures in 2017, and actively oversees all executive-level salary and compensation matters for the Company.

On January 13, 2022, our Board adopted a new formal charter for the Compensation Committee pursuant to NASDAQ rules and regulations. As defined in its Charter, the purpose of the Compensation Committee is to assist the Board in carrying out its responsibilities relating to compensation and benefits for the Company’s directors, officers and employees. The Compensation Committee is also responsible for performing the duties relating to executive compensation provided for in the rules of the national securities exchange on which the Company’s stock may be listed. The Committee is also responsible for preparing any compensation committee reports required in the Company’s annual report and proxy materials by the rules of the SEC. The Compensation Committee also oversees the performance of the Audit Committee.

Under the new Charter, the Compensation Committee shall consist of no fewer than two directors. Each member of the Compensation Committee shall be an “independent director” as that term is defined in the applicable rules of NASDAQ, or any successor national securities exchange on which the Company’s stock is listed. Each member of the Compensation Committee shall be free from any relationship (including disallowed compensatory arrangements) that in the opinion of the Board would interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment as a member of the Committee. All of the members of the Committee must qualify as “non-employee directors” for the purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. We have not yet established a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (“Nominating Committee”). Up to this time, we believe that we have been able to effectively manage the issues normally considered by a Nominating Committee through the Board of Directors. If the Company is approved for listing on NASDAQ, the Company will constitute its Nominating Committee. The Company may not be approved for NASDAQ listing and may not appoint additional directors if the NASDAQ listing is not approved.

On January 13, 2022, our Board adopted a new formal charter for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee pursuant to NASDAQ rules. The purpose of the Nominating Committee is to carry out the responsibilities delegated by the board of directors relating to the Company’s director nominations process, developing and maintaining the Company’s corporate governance policies and any related matters required by the federal securities laws. The Nominating Committee shall consist of two or more directors. Each member of the Committee shall be independent in accordance with the rules of NASDAQ and SEC rules and regulations.

ITEM 11: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth information regarding compensation earned in or with respect to our fiscal year 2021 and 2020 for the following persons (“Names Executive Officers”):

Summary Executive Compensation Table

Executive Employment Agreements

C. Richard Piazza – Executive Chairman. Mr. Piazza signed his employment agreement with the Company on November 1, 2020, with an effective date of November 6, 2020. This agreement was amended and restated on December 6, 2021. The term is three years, with extensions at the agreement of the parties. His base salary is $400,000 per year, however, he is currently receiving a partial salary of $112,500 until the Company’s next financing is completed. Under the amended agreement, Mr. Piazza is entitled to receive regular company benefits, including annual bonuses and salary increases, participation in management incentive plans involving cash or stock bonuses ranging from 25% and 125% of base salary, vacations, sick leave and PTO. Mr. Piazza is also entitled to receive a transaction bonus in the instance any of the Company’s assets are sold or sublicensed or if the Company or its subsidiary is acquired, equal to 1.75% of the consideration received by the Company. If he is terminated for cause, as defined in the agreement, or he leaves the employment of the Company on his own volition, Mr. Piazza shall receive salary and benefits that have accrued up to the date of termination. If he is terminated without cause or following a material change, as defined in the agreement, Mr. Piazza will receive salary through the date of termination plus a pro-rated portion of bonus that would be earned during the full year when the termination became effective (or a lump sum of 50% of the full target bonus), all stock options shall vest immediately, and base salary and healthcare benefits will continue for 24 months. Mr. Piazza also agreed to a 12 month non-compete / non-solicitation, and signed a separate Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement with his employment agreement which assigns to the Company any intellectual property developed by him during his employment.

Douglas Baum, CEO. Mr. Baum signed his employment agreement with the Company on November 1, 2020, with an effective date of November 6, 2020. This agreement was amended and restated on December 6, 2021. The term is three years, with extensions at the agreement of the parties. His base salary is $400,000 per year, however, he is currently receiving partial salary of $125,000 until the Company’s next financing is completed. Under the amended agreement, Mr. Baum is entitled to receive regular company benefits, including annual bonuses and salary increases, participation in management incentive plans involving cash or stock bonuses ranging from 25% and 125% of base salary, vacations, sick leave and PTO. Mr. Baum is also entitled to receive a transaction bonus in the instance any of the Company’s assets are sold or sublicensed or if the Company or its subsidiary is acquired, equal to 1.75% of the consideration received by the Company. If he is terminated for cause, as defined in the agreement, or he leaves the employment of the Company on his own volition, Mr. Baum shall receive salary and benefits that have accrued up to the date of termination. If he is terminated without cause or following a material change, as defined in the agreement, Mr. Baum will receive salary through the date of termination plus a pro-rated portion of bonus that would be earned during the full year when the termination became effective (or a lump sum of 50% of the full target bonus), all stock options shall vest immediately and salary and healthcare benefits will continue for 24 months. Mr. Baum also agreed to a 12 month non-compete / non-solicitation, and signed a separate Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement with his employment agreement which assigns to the Company any intellectual property developed by him during his employment.

Christopher Nelson, General Counsel. Mr. Nelson initially signed his employment agreement in 2017, which renewed on a year-to-year basis on April 1 each year. On December 6, 2021, Mr. Nelson signed an amended and restated employment agreement with the Company providing for a term of three years, with extensions at the agreement of the parties. His base salary is $300,000 per year; however, he is currently receiving partial salary of $100,000 until the Company’s next financing is completed. Under the amended agreement, Mr. Nelson is entitled to receive regular company benefits, including annual bonuses and salary increases, vacations, sick leave and PTO. Mr. Nelson is also entitled to receive a transaction bonus in the instance any of the Company’s assets are sold or sublicensed or if the Company or its subsidiary is acquired, equal to 0.5% of the consideration received by the Company. If he is terminated for cause, as defined in the agreement, or he leaves the employment of the Company on his own volition, Mr. Nelson shall receive salary and benefits that have accrued up to the date of termination. If he is terminated without cause or following a material change, as defined in the agreement, Mr. Nelson will receive salary through the date of termination plus a pro-rated portion of bonus that would be earned during the full year when the termination became effective (or a lump sum of 50% of the full target bonus), all stock options shall vest immediately and salary and healthcare benefits will continue for 18 months. Mr. Nelson also agreed to a 12 month non-compete / non-solicitation, and signed a separate Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement with his employment agreement which assigns to the Company any intellectual property developed by him during his employment.

Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement

All officers, directors (except Joel Mayersohn), and other key employees and consultants have signed a Proprietary Information and Invention Agreement (“PIIA”) with the Company that provides in material part the following:

Outstanding Option and Stock Awards

The following table presents information concerning unexercised options and unvested restricted stock awards for the named executive officer outstanding as of December 31, 2021.

Outstanding Option and Stock Awards

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

Equity Compensation Plan Information.