Transition report pursuant to Rule 13a-10 or 15d-10

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT AND DERIVITATIVES

v3.3.1.900
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT AND DERIVITATIVES
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT AND DERIVATIVES [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT AND DERIVATIVES

 

 

NOTE 9 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT AND DERIVATIVES

 

The Company measures fair value in accordance with a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

 

   
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2 Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and
Level 3 Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).

 

 

All derivatives recognized by the Company are reported as derivative liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and are adjusted to their fair value at each reporting date.  Unrealized gains and losses on derivative instruments are included in change in value of derivative liabilities on the consolidated statement of operations.  

 

The following table sets forth the Company’s consolidated financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

 

 

 

                         
    Fair value at                  
    December 31, 2015   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3
Preferred stock embedded conversion feature   $ 376,065   $  -   $  -   $ 376,065
Ratchet provision in common stock warrants included with preferred stock     51,203      -         -     51,203
Debenture embedded conversion feature     560,778      -              -       560,778
Ratchet provision in common stock warrants included with debentures     79,943     -               -      79,943
Total derivatives   $ 1,067,989   $  -   $ -   $ 1,067,989

 

 

There were no derivative liabilities at December 31, 2014.

 

There were no transfers between levels during the year to date ended December 31, 2015.

 

 As part of the Merger, the Company assumed debentures that are convertible into shares of common stock, which Anpath issued in July 2014. The debentures conversion price will be adjusted depending on various circumstances. The conversion options embedded in these instruments contain no explicit limit to the number of shares to be issued upon settlement and as a result are classified as liabilities under ASC 815. Additionally, the Company issued in connection with the debentures 415,000 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock.  The conversion price will be adjusted depending on various circumstances, and as there is no explicit limit to the number of shares of be issued upon settlement they are classified as liabilities under ASC 815.   

 

The terms of the convertible redeemable preferred stock (see Note 10) include an anti-dilution provision that requires an adjustment in the common stock conversion ratio should subsequent issuances of the Company’s common stock be issued below the instruments’ original conversion price of $0.26 per share, subject to certain defined excluded issuances.  Accordingly, we bifurcated the embedded conversion feature, which is shown as a derivative liability recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet.

 

The agreement setting forth the terms of the common stock warrants issued to the holders of the convertible preferred stock (see Note 10) also includes an anti-dilution provision that requires a reduction in the warrant’s exercise price of $0.50 should the conversion ratio of the convertible preferred stock be adjusted due to anti-dilution provisions. Accordingly, the warrants do not qualify for equity classification, and, as a result, the fair value of the derivative is shown as a derivative liability on the consolidated balance sheet.

 

The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of items measured at fair value on a recurring basis that use significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) and the related realized and unrealized gains (losses) recorded in the consolidated statement of operations during the period:

 

                                 
      Year Ended December 31, 2015  
      Preferred stock embedded conversion feature     Ratchet provision in common stock warrants included with preferred stock     Debenture embedded conversion feature     Ratchet provision in common stock warrants included with debentures     Total  
Fair value,                                 
beginning of period   $ --   $ --   $ --      $ --   $ --    
Net unrealized                                
losses on derivatives     205,509     23,503     (85,319)       (12,163)     131,530    
Purchases and issuances     170,556     27,700       646,097                92,106        936,459  
Sales and settlements,                                
included in                                
derivative gain (loss)     --     --     --       --     --    
Gross transfers in     --     --     --       --     --    
Gross transfers out     --     --     --       --     --    
Fair value, end of period   $ 376,065   $ 51,203   $ 560,778     $ 79,943   $ 1,067,989  
                                 
Changes in realized (gains)                                
losses, included in                                
income on                                
instruments held                                
at end of period     --     --     --     --     --  
Changes in unrealized                                
 losses, included                                
in income on                                
instruments held                                
at end of period   $ 205,509   $ 23,503   $ (85,319)   $ (12,163)   $ 131,530  
                                 

 

 

The Company’s derivative liabilities are valued by using Black Scholes methods which approximate Monte Carlo Simulation methods. Where possible, the Company verifies the values produced by its pricing models to market prices. Valuation models require a variety of inputs, including contractual terms, market prices, yield curves, credit spreads, measures of volatility and correlations of such inputs. These derivative liabilities do not trade in liquid markets, and as such, model inputs cannot generally be verified and do involve significant management judgment. Such instruments are typically classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company uses Black Scholes methods which approximate Monte Carlo Simulation methods to value its derivatives based upon the following assumptions: dividend yield of -0-%, volatility of 42.33 – 52.08%, risk free rates of 0.49 - 1.76% and an expected term of 0.60 years to 5.00 years.